web analytics
Currently viewing the tag: "Miscellaneous"

Is usually just conservativespeak for “something I do not like.” Not sure what other word to apply to this though:

Not all ideas are good ideas. In a controversial photo posted to Reddit, one man revealed that Mountain Dew has created a a new, junk food abomination: a Doritos-flavored soft drink.

Steve Barnes posted the single image of a solo cup he had sampled at a taste-testing event toReddit, in front of a “Mtn Dew: Dewitos” banner, sending the internet into a horrified frenzy

They have a picture too:

Lev filed this under:  

William Shatner’s interpretation of “She Blinded Me With Science”:

This weekend I intend to finish The Ambition and The Power, about Jim Wright’s speakership in the late ’80s. Read it on a recommendation from the estimable Jonathan Bernstein, and it’s still quite readable even if most of the figures are no longer still around. The book is at its best when describing the Reagan Administration and Reagan himself–I’ve never quite bought the liberal cartoon of Reagan as a moronic, glassy-eyed presence in the presidency, and needless to say I never bought into the right’s myth of the man either. And the whole Reagan/Tip O’Neill compromising celebration from the centrists, well, that seemed a bit incomplete as well (turns out that O’Neill generally didn’t fight Reagan on what he wanted, while Wright did). This book lays out a very plausible portrait of Reagan as someone who is palpably tired of all this shit, but is completely stubborn and ideological, willful and not really all that trustworthy, constantly playing power games and working along different tracks at the same time to accomplish his goals. Machiavellian but not terribly clever. You can sort of see why his Administration had the sorts of scandal troubles it did, given the stubbornness, impatience, and raw power exercises that Reagan displays in the book. Though, in all fairness, I doubt that any of this is unique to him, or uncommon among presidents. It’s also definitely interesting to read stories about Reagan’s being ignored in his pleas to Senate Republicans, considering how he’s perceived by the GOP today, but it makes sense: by that time Reagan was a lame duck, and those guys had their own troubles to worry about. Definitely an interesting read for people interested in politics (i.e. anyone reading this).

Lev filed this under: ,  

This is a big f’ing deal: “Russia’s State Duma on Friday voted to recognise Polish victims of the 1940 Katyn massacre as a tragedy for Poland and Russia, and to acknowledge that the killings had been ordered by Soviet leader Josef Stalin.” Why is it relevant? Because, for those who don’t know, back in 1940 the Soviet army massacred over 20,000 Poles, and effectively took out an entire generation of Poland’s brightest young men and contributed to the famously antagonistic relationship between the two countries. I’m not an expert on the massacre, but I don’t think calling it an open wound in the souls of both nations is too radical an assertion. So an apology, however belated, is a really important event. Despite the time lapse it seems there’s still a cultural footprint for Katyn: there was a pretty good British movie from a few years back that hinged on the incident, though for a more thorough backgrounder on the massacre, click here.

I always find this sort of stuff interesting. It’s purely symbolic at this point, as it’s 70 years later, but it’s relevant in the sense that it shows how today’s Russians are thinking about their past (or, at least, how their political elite is thinking). It’s so easy for nations to hang onto their own mythology if the alternative damages what they’ve accepted as the truth about themselves: you see this notably in Turkey over the Armenian Genocide, and you see a highly similar phenomenon among many Southerners (often older ones) about the Civil War, its justice and causes. Katyn did not have nearly the same mythical significance to Russia as those events did to their nations, being a full-on massacre ordered by a leader whose prestige ended almost immediately after his death instead of a massacre ordered by a beloved leader, or a senseless war fought (in the eyes of the South) against Northern interlopers. Regardless of these differences, it’s the right thing to do, with Russia properly showing humility over such a profound tragedy. Russia’s government has decided to let this old wound heal, and I salute them for it. One wonders if it will take so long for our country to come to grips with the actions of our government over the past decade. There is no guarantee of how future history will judge the wars and lawlesness of our present time, but this action provides me with some hope, at least, of eventual justice, even if it’s only symbolic.

Lev filed this under: , , ,  

For those of us that have been complaining about the obvious Republican bias in Scott Rasmussen’s polls since Obama was sworn in, all while the mainstream media called us hyperbolic, we now finally have the definitive takedown by numbers guru Nate Silver following the 2010 elections.

The 105 polls released in Senate and gubernatorial races by Rasmussen Reports and its subsidiary, Pulse Opinion Research, missed the final margin between the candidates by 5.8 points, a considerably higher figure than that achieved by most other pollsters. Some 13 of its polls missed by 10 or more points, including one in the Hawaii Senate race that missed the final margin between the candidates by 40 points, the largest error ever recorded in a general election in FiveThirtyEight’s database, which includes all polls conducted since 1998.

Moreover, Rasmussen’s polls were quite biased, overestimating the standing of the Republican candidate by almost 4 points on average. In just 12 cases, Rasmussen’s polls overestimated the margin for the Democrat by 3 or more points. But it did so for the Republican candidate in 55 cases — that is, in more than half of the polls that it issued.

In the past, Rasmussen ‘s goal was to use his biased polls to help shape the media narrative for the Republicans (well, mission accomplished). The trick though was to fix his methodology as the actual voting approached so he wouldn’t look like such an outlier, but apparently he got too cocky this season. Can we all now agree to ignore Rasmussen forever?

Rupert Psmith filed this under:  

Nearly a quarter of South Korean men over 75 are still in the labor force, as are 14 percent of Japanese men. In the United States, a 10th of such men are working or seeking work, compared with half of 1 percent in France.

Put another way, a Korean man over 75 is more likely to be working than a Frenchman in his early 60s.

(More here, via)

Protests continued this week in France as the Parliament approved a bill that would raise the minimum age for French retirement benefits from 60 to 62 (same as US).

Gherald filed this under:  

Some people’s pitch could use a little work.

Gherald filed this under:  

Greg Sargent at The Plum Line reports on a lovely piece straight out of the Minitrue RecDep. A shadowy conservative group called the 60 Plus Association is sending out mailers warning Virginians that they may soon end up in an “Obamaville” if they don’t vote out the Democrat, Rep. Gerry Connolly. Connolly, they point out, supported the dreaded stimulus.

Greg Sargent:

What’s particularly interesting about this mailer is that the “Hooverville,” of course, was a symbol of government inaction in the face of the poverty and widespread misery of the Great Depression. But the 60 Plus Association, which is devoted to free enterprise and less taxation, is warning that “Obamavilles” will result if we don’t roll back government.

What’s the other big issue for the 60 Plus Association, you ask? They want the extension of the Bush tax cuts on the top 2% … presumably so the Koch brothers don’t have to join a bread line.

Rupert Psmith filed this under: