A scientist responds to Creationists seeking a propaganda exercise debate:

Academic debate on controversial topics is fine, but those topics need to have a basis in reality. I would not invite a creationist to a debate on campus for the same reason that I would not invite an alchemist, a flat-earther, an astrologer, a psychic, or a Holocaust revisionist. These ideas have no scientific support, and that is why they have all been discarded by credible scholars. Creationism is in the same category.

Share

I don’t know how I missed this polling data from back in December:

Three-quarters of U.S. adults (75%) favor either marriage or domestic partnerships/civil unions for gay and lesbian couples. Only about two in 10 (22%) say gay and lesbian couples should have no legal recognition.

That’s pretty stunning. Three-quarters of Americans favor at least civil unions for gay couples, with only 22% saying that gay people should just go burn in hell already and stop trying to interfere with their God-given right to hate.

Share
Metavirus filed this under: , , ,  

Matt Yglesias put up a thought-provoking graph which illustrates that legalization of pot receives a higher approval rating among Americans than the Republican Party and its leaders:

popularity.png

I wonder what else is more popular than Republicans right now? Repo men? VD?

Share
Metavirus filed this under: , ,  

This has got to be one of my favorite quotes in a while:

“The president prefers to tell the truth, rather than make the numbers look better by pretending.”

That’s Obama’s OMB Director Peter Orszag on a remarkable step forward toward greater transparency in government that was announced earlier today.

Here’s what happened in a nutshell. Over the last eight years, whenever Bush submitted a proposed budget to Congress, he intentionally hid hundreds of billions of dollars in spending (for things like, say, the Iraq War) as so-called “off-budget” items. This was done with the intent of making Bush’s budgets seem way smaller than they really were.

What Obama has now done is to do away with all that. His budgets will now include all budget spending and will no longer hide countless billions in an “off budget” footnote.

Here’s Steve Benen:

It’s about damn time. The smoke-and-mirrors approach to which we’ve grown accustomed was ridiculous. It was a problem policymakers recognized, but didn’t want to talk about, and had no interest in fixing. It’s not only heartening to see Obama bring some sanity to the process, it will also have key practical consequences — honest budgets lead to better policy making.

Noam Scheiber added that it will be “kinda helpful to have a budget that actually means something when you’re debating public policy,” and added the political upside to using honest budget numbers for a change: “Why not make the long-term deficit look as large as possible at the beginning of your term? Not only can you fairly blame your predecessor at that point; the bigger the deficit looks, the easier it is to show progress, which Obama will need to do as he runs for re-election. To take one example, you can’t claim savings from drawing down in Iraq if you don’t put Iraq spending on the budget in the first place (which Bush mostly didn’t).”

Share

Take a stab at guessing who said this at about Rush Limbaugh’s hope that Obama fails:

That was a terrible thing to say. I mean, he’s the president of all the country. If he succeeds, the country succeeds. And if he doesn’t, it hurts us all. Anybody who would pull against our president is not exactly thinking rationally.

Give up? Some liberal communist hippy? Some homosexual San Francisco-dwelling deviant?

Nope, Pat Robertson. Yep, the fundamentalist Christianist nutter who routinely blames the country’s ills on gays, abortionists and liberals.

You know the world is going topsy-turvy when Pat Robertson starts making sense.

Share

Another Gitmo whistleblower comes out from hiding and reveals some truly horrifying new facts:

[T]he Nelly account shows that health professionals are right in the thick of the torture and abuse of the prisoners—suggesting a systematic collapse of professional ethics driven by the Pentagon itself.

He describes body searches undertaken for no legitimate security purpose, simply to sexually invade and humiliate the prisoners. This was a standardized Bush Administration tactic–the importance of which became apparent to me when I participated in some Capitol Hill negotiations with White House representatives relating to legislation creating criminal law accountability for contractors.

The Bush White House vehemently objected to provisions of the law dealing with rape by instrumentality. When House negotiators pressed to know why, they were met first with silence and then an embarrassed acknowledgement that a key part of the Bush program included invasion of the bodies of prisoners in a way that might be deemed rape by instrumentality under existing federal and state criminal statutes. While these techniques have long been known, the role of health care professionals in implementing them is shocking.

Such profound shame…

Share

A new survey of historians on the Bush presidency came out recently.

Drum roll, please… Bush ranked among the ten worst Presidents of all time:

Today, C-SPAN released its second Historians Survey of Presidential Leadership, in which “65 presidential historians ranked the 42 former occupants of the White House on ten attributes of leadership.” Coming in first was Abraham Lincoln, followed by George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt, and Harry Truman. Finishing last was James Buchanan. George W. Bush came in 36th, just beating out Millard Fillmore, who ranked 37th. A look at how historians judged Bush on measures such as his “economic management” and “moral authority”:

bushcspan3.gif

Share
Metavirus filed this under: , , , , ,  

Wow, what a surprise:

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – Illinois House Republicans say they want U.S. Sen. Roland Burris investigated for perjury.

State Rep. Jim Durkin told The Associated Press he and GOP leader Tom Cross will ask for an outside investigation into whether Burris perjured himself before a House committee investigating former Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s impeachment.

This morning Burris admitted Blagojevich’s brother had solicited a campaign contribution from him, a fact he didn’t mention to the impeachment committee last month:

The disclosure is at odds with Burris’ testimony in January when an Illinois House impeachment committee specifically asked if he had ever spoken to Robert Blagojevich or other aides to the now-deposed governor about the Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama.

As I mentioned in a number of earlier posts, I thought the Burris appointment was a travesty. I never fully trusted the guy and now it looks like my suspicions were well-founded.

Share
Metavirus filed this under: , ,