I’m surprised that any of the fervently ignorant people surveyed in this study ever ended up moderating their positions.  I wonder if the researchers included teabaggers in the sample population…

Four researchers at three different institutions joined forces to ask a simple question: why is it that people have such extreme positions on subjects that are rather complicated and nuanced? “We hypothesized that people typically know less about such policies than they think they do,” the authors write, going on to discuss their experimental method: asking people with extreme opinions to explain the issue. That brought an end to their subjects’ belief that they actually understood the issue they were otherwise willing to argue passionately about (or, as the authors put it, “undermined the illusion of explanatory depth”). Once people recognized their ignorance, positions tended to moderate.


Metavirus filed this under: , ,  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *