This is just amazing:
South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, a close Romney ally, said it was “offensive” for Democrats to say they’re better for women on reproductive rights. Speaking with reporters at the Republican National Convention, Haley said Democrats drawing attention to the pro-life plank in the party’s platform are merely “distracting” from Obama’s record. Asked if the platform does indeed call for a total ban on abortion with no exceptions for rape or incest, Haley replied, “I have no idea. I haven’t been paying attention.” The platform endorses the Human Life Amendment, which would give constitutional rights to fetuses, and thus equate abortion with murder.
I’ve read this paragraph about five times now, and I’m just amazed that a person with a presumably functional brain could get this out without shuddering and collapsing. Haley thinks that Republicans ought to be offended that Democrats are asserting their superiority on matters of reproductive rights? What kind of apology might she be looking for? (“Sorry for reading your platform before you did?”) And the second graph is about as confusing:
Women are not one issue voters, we care about the economy,” she explained. ”These debates [abortion] that you fellas keep talking about, that the Dems keep talking about, is just not where women are… The only people that are saying that the Democrats are the better party for women are Democrats. And they think if they say it enough, we’ll believe it, and that’s probably about as offensive as it gets,” Haley added.
Perhaps she didn’t get the memo that the economy is out, and divisive culture war skirmishes are in when it comes to the Romney campaign, so this is entirely pret a porter.
This gets back to one of my ongoing fixations: minority (and women) Republicans with power who nonetheless try to assert leadership over their own cohorts. Just like Michael Steele during his RNC salad days, and one or two brief moments of Herman Cain’s presidential bid, this sort of leadership campaign just doesn’t work from within the confines of a high-profile Republican position. Steele’s sad antics showed someone desperate to exercise some form of cultural leadership in a context that wouldn’t allow it substantively, and his symbolic outreach (“hip hop conservatism”) was hilariously inept. Cain at times flirted with being angry about the lot of black people in America before inevitably remembering his role as the validator of white rage, and then he had to walk it back. Haley here seems to be trying to demonstrate gender leadership, trying to tell women that social issues don’t matter as much as having firm economic management (from her point of view, anyway). But she can’t do it without jettisoning, well, almost all women. The idea that women don’t care at all about debates concerning their own bodies is a bizarre one. I’m guessing, for example, that quite a few of them are behind Todd Akin’s precipitous collapse in Missouri. The problems here–insulting the audience’s intelligence, feigning ignorance of the party’s platform (or actually being ignorant of it, which is worse for someone opining on the issue for the press), throwing around inflammatory terms with no basis while dismissing legitimate concerns–display an incredible lack of sensitivity to what women outside beet-red states think about these issues, and really more of a contempt for all that to boot. Which is to say that Haley is a politician for the 27%, and no one else. Only she doesn’t really realize it.
Either that, or she’s just Christine O’Donnell in an elaborate disguise. Which I’m not prepared to rule out at this point. I realize that “rising star” Republicans at this point just mean younger, not as white, and perhaps female Republicans with the exact same beliefs, rather than “demonstrating enormous promise as a potential political leader in the future,” i.e. the actual definition of the term. Republicans keep finding more of the former, but the latter remain to be seen. Haley barely held on to win an election in South Carolina, and if she’s the future of the GOP, then there’s no future.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Hors D’oeuvres
Actual Living Pro-labor Republicans Sighted?
Given that the bill itself seems to be redundant–a bill requiring the NLRB to observe quorum rules?–to the extent that voting for it is essentially a slap at labor, the Republican no votes here are probably a legit accounting of which House Repubs aren’t completely antagonistic to labor. The number appears to be ten, though > more ... (0 comments)I honestly hadn’t given it too much thought, and was probably disposed against it just because of who was for it, but Emily makes a very strong case for why Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard ought to be released from prison. She argues that it makes sense on humanitarian and political grounds, and I agree with > more ... (0 comments)This Is What the Internets Were Made For
As much as I love WJHL’s article Witnesses: Man drove 90 mph with genitals hanging out the window (and with lines like:At over 90 miles per hour, he had his penis out [the window]… he was masturbating… and that’s when it got really, really bad. I wouldn’t look over any more, and I wrote his tag number down on my hand, which I believe he noticed, and he exited very quickly.
> more ... (0 comments)An unintentional libertarian anthem/meditation from Sully at the Dish:By then, the subtleties, the mixes of CBD and THC, the nuances of sativa and indica strains will all be turned by the genius of the free market into something quite marvelous. We will finally have made of this weed what was long made of the simple grape. And we will all be happier.
> more ... (0 comments)Jack Shafer says “Foreign Correspondents”: Pyongyang reliably remains defiant; talks have resumed or been proposed, canceled, or stalled, while a U.S. envoy seeks to lure the North back to those talks to restart the dialog; North Korea is bluffing, blustering, or is engaging in brinksmanship; tensions are grim, rising, or growing—but rarely reduced, probably because > more ... (0 comments)Not Too Tired To Fight, Just Too Bored This Time
If it’s okay with you, I’m just going to take a powder on this one. It’s only minimally news, we knew that Obama wants to cut “entitlements” already, only now he’s just putting it in an official document that is going to be duly ignored by Paul Ryan in a matter of months. The article > more ... (0 comments)Plebs is coming to ITV: httpv://youtu.be/xlm1VAN4XXQ Somewhat tangentially, I ran across a Cicero quote just recently impuning the moral fiber of the poor; it reminded me of our own current and continuing struggle with the morality of poverty: Gaius Gracchus passed a grain law: this delighted the plebs, for an abundance of food could now be had > more ... (0 comments)What's the average amount of times a smartphone user visits Facebook per day?
Fourteen. I’m a little under that, with zero on most days. Really, Facebook is only still useful to me as a way of handling event correspondence, which coupled with the (fairly nominal but needless and annoying) social effects of closing my account is the reason why I still have it. In a word, inertia. Y’all > more ... (2 comments)I Am Gonna Get Pranked *Hard* Come April Fool's Day
What with one thing or another — brain cells giving their final, weak-ass fuck; supposed leaders of society running around like they lost their damn minds; dogs and cats, living together, mass hysteria — I find I can no longer tell what’s an actual news story anymore, and what’s some made-up middle-school fart-type-joke. Via the Raw > more ... (2 comments)Ketchikan’s KRBD recently broadcast a story about Congressman Don Young (R-AK). In one segment, Young waxed nostalgic about Tha Browns of his youth: My father had a ranch. We used to hire 50 to 60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes, you know. It takes two people to pick the same tomatoes now. It’s all done by machine. Today’s > more ... (0 comments)New Hampshire is moving forward with repeal of the state Stand Your Ground law. Of course, New Hampshire is a “blue” state generally. But it’s quite gun-friendly, with a pronounced libertarian ethos. So this could be a somewhat risky move, and if you read the article, it looks like the paranoiac NRA-loving assholes are in rare > more ... (0 comments)You know what pisses me off? Any jibber jabber at SCOTUS about hurting the fee fees of backward states like Alabama. The question is whether legislating against gays marrying (like legislating against different races marrying) violates equal protection. None of this has anything to do with whether southern governors will have a Sad, or > more ... (1 comments)If The Tolerators Are Intolerant Of The Tolerant, Will The Intolerators Be Tolerant Once More?
God’s precious accident, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, had a brain/mouth-leak today about Mean Gays: “The underlying problem is that there is this very vocal, very litigious minority of Americans willing to legally attack anybody who dares utter a phrase or even a name that they don’t agree with,” he said. “In a twisting of logic, they > more ... (0 comments)Your Daily FOX News Desperation Play On Gay Marriage
To paraphrase: Yeah, sure, a lot of people say they like same-sex marriage. But maybe they secretly don’t. Also, what about all those state bans! You know, the ones that passed nearly a decade ago, during which time opinion has changed rapidly on the issue, thus invaliding my premise. Also, Prop 8! Remember when the > more ... (1 comments)Joephylactics (from Bill Gates Will Pay for a Better Condom): Several years ago a German company introduced a spray-on condom, but the product was withdrawn because men did not want to wait the full minute for the product to dry. Unfortunately Not Joeking (from New Site: Legalize Jesus): The best way to glorify Jesus, apparently, is through the > more ... (0 comments)This bit from an article discussing the treatment of torture in the movie Zero Dark Thirty makes me severely depressed.If I’m…the Screenwriter, the simplest thing to do, is to have the Maya character take some kind of stand…“The reason he’s giving you bullshit is you keep torturing him!”… But the second you do that, guess what you’ve done…you’ve made Maya parrot the Obama Administration line. Being Anti-Torture might be seen as taking a political stance, one in favor of the Obama administration.
> more ... (0 comments)Recent Trackbacks
- Political Analytical – Insight and Analysis on Politics and Reason: Mike’s Blog Round Up
- Library Grape: What the Crippity-Crap?
- I Want My Mommy!: /* */ /* */ Francis Sedgemore – journalist and science writerCrooked Timber — Out of...
- Balloon Juice: Career opportunities
- Library Grape: It's Shit Like This....
Esteemed Wineries
- American Times
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Atheist Revolution
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Palin Watch
- Pharyngula
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- Washington Monthly
THE GRAPEVINE
Tasting Menu
- Chart of the Day: Bush Tax Cuts Didn't Spur Net Job Growth
- Mass. Candidate Scott Brown Pondered Whether Obama Is a Bastard
- The Chilling Rise of Right-Wing Hate in America
- The Best/Worst Argument Against Gay Marriage Ever
- Trump as the New Wes Clark?
- Democrats Should Totally Use The Politics Of Fear
- Slavemaster-Run Healthcare Keeps Blacks Addicted To Government Teat
- A Dinosaur Infringed On A Patent For Rocks...
- Cartoon of the Day: Where's The Room For a Middle Ground?
- Becoming IBM: The HBO Story
Post Cellar
- April 2013 (19)
- March 2013 (56)
- February 2013 (42)
- January 2013 (71)
- December 2012 (67)
- November 2012 (40)
- October 2012 (44)
- September 2012 (35)
- August 2012 (39)
- July 2012 (36)
- June 2012 (35)
- May 2012 (42)
- April 2012 (42)
- March 2012 (64)
- February 2012 (71)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (63)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)
Wine Labels
2012 Election 2012 Elections Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Paul Ryan Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on Terror


omg to:
Um… Seriously? No… really… seriously?
Yep, those darn fellas, always bringing up that Abortion -- which you all want to do to us. Women are SOOOOO over the debate over involuntary uterine servitude.
Dems are willing to take antiyhng at all if it is called health reform’ without reading it for themselves. Republicans and independents aren’t.The government has no Constituitonal power to force 300 million people to enrich insurance companies and big Pharma by being required to purchase sucky policies they would never have chosen for themselves. And medicare being cut $500 billion just as those who paid in all their lives get up to the point of needing the expensive care shows precisely why government should not be trusted with our health care.The question is, why on earth do Dems who know what is in the bill want it to be passed?And most PEOPLE I know don’t care about government run option’ in the scheme of things. Once government has designed the sucky policy and limited our choices to what we can get, and shielded the committee deciding what is cost effective’ enough to be given out as health care, and drastically raised the premiums, it is little matter who administers the sucky policy.Who protects us from our government? At least now we can sue insurers.
I am reminded at this time of the (alleged) Pauline Kael quote about nobody she knew voting for Nixon. And, for some reason, this also too.