Good news.

I find the war on voting to be pretty evil, but also stupid. Is shaving a few votes worth poisoning your own image for decades? And eventually the population trends are going to be completely unavoidable, the restrictive measures will be undone, and then without them it will require a much more dramatic political reinvention for the GOP to stay competitive. Which obviously wouldn’t cause any sort of intramural strife at all.

Really, the voting stuff is probably the best single point for the “2012 Or Bust” theory, i.e. that this is the last gasp of unreconstructed Goldwater-Reagan conservatism, and Republicans are putting everything they’ve got into this election cycle. This is such a small advantage temporarily, at potentially a catastrophic long-term cost. I can understand why Romney would drape an arm around Nikki Haley and applaud her efforts on this front–I hear he might be willing to compromise his views to gain power–but it’s pretty strange that seemingly no one else has thought about the implications past 2012, or cares. It would be one thing to take such a big gamble for a Ronald Reagan. But for Mitt Romney? Seriously?

{ 1 comment }
  1. Metavirus says:

    it would only make the republicans look bad if the news media actually called it what it is. unfortunately, those precious low-information voters only get media-enabled stenography.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>