Gotta love this:

Law firm King & Spalding announced Monday it will not defend the Defense of Marriage Act on behalf of the U.S. House of Representatives. Afterward, Paul Clement, the partner who had taken the case, announced he intents to defend the law with another firm.

“Today the firm filed a motion to withdraw from its engagement to represent the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives on the constitutional issues regarding Section III of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act,” King & Spalding chairman Robert D. Hays, Jr. said in a statement. “Last week we worked diligently through the process required for withdrawal.” [...]

Jon Davidson, legal director of Lambda Legal, the nation’s oldest and largest legal organization working for LGBT equality, told The Huffington Post that defending the law would likely hurt the firm’s effort to recruit lawyers. He added that he would also be no longer comfortable working with the firm on cases.

Sadly, I don’t think we’ll be getting a round of “Republicans in disarray!” stories over this one. But it’s great that now, even legally opposing recognition of gay marriage is considered an embarrassing and backward thing to do.

{ 1 comment }
Lev filed this under:  
  1. I agree, lawyers should, and must, defend unpopular cases otherwise we all lose. If the law is beholden to pressure groups of any stripe then the law is useless, take a look at the Supreme Court Justices being removed in the Midwest. Regardless of what you feel about Clement, his position has merit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>