John Dvorak considers.

Lev filed this under: , ,  
  1. Lev says:

    Key quote: “Facebook is a simple system for the masses that do not really care about technology and do not want to learn anything new except something easy like Facebook.”

  2. Kevin Ortiz says:

    Dvorak prefers that we go back to using email lists to share family pictures, or snail mail?

    • Lev says:

      His argument is basically that people should use technology to do stuff (like starting your own website) instead of using a prefab system that takes liberties with your personal information and privacy. It’s an interesting argument, though I think different things work for different people.

      • Metavirus says:

        that prescription would work for maybe about 2% of the populace, give or take. dvorak pretty much admits as much at the end of his article (i.e., “There is no reason for anyone with any chops online to be remotely involved with Facebook, except to peruse it for lost relatives”). most folks treat technology as a utility and flock to utilities that serve a need they are searching for. facebook was faster, more attractive, and easier to use than things like myspace and friendster, which is why people flocked to it and why rupert murdoch is ritually torturing, on a daily basis in a dank basement somewhere, the idiot who made him buy myspace.

        by the way, in terms of good technology writing etiquette, he should know better to equate a technology platform with AOL. comparing anything technological to AOL is like comparing someone to Hitler. Bad form. ;-)

  3. Metavirus says:

    one key point that dvorak misses is that AOL was created to be The Community. facebook was created to facilitate people’s existing communities.

    at its root, dvorak’s article really isn’t much more than a techie baby boomer’s first steps into the calming waters of starting to tell those damn kids to get off his lawn.

    • Lev says:

      That’s a good distinction to make. There is that whiff of a tech nerd lashing out against something that’s actually easy to use, which is the sort of impetus that led to older versions of the Unix text editor using “g” as the command to find something in the text.

      • Metavirus says:

        yeah, when i saw that he didn’t bother to pay any mind to that distinction, i started to smell old codger lounging on his front porch in a rocking chair cradling a shotgun. after all, the community aspect of AOL/Compuserve was such that people primarily went to AOL/Compuserve to interact with other AOL/Compuserve users in forums that AOL and Compuserve created (see, e.g., chat rooms). Sure, Facebook provides a similar mechanism to chat with people and post stuff to a group, but the users you’re interacting with are all generally people from some kind of a real-life context. i think it makes a mountain of difference. but perhaps not to old codgers who want to yell at the kids today, what with the saggy pants and that galdurn hippity hop music! :)

  4. Gherald says:

    John Dvorak.. John Dvorak… where have I heard that name before? Oh right! Twelve years ago when PC magazines used to be relevant.

    Also, is there any greater irony to “1,530 people like this. Be the first of your friends.” ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>