In the afterglow of yesterday’s monumental ruling on Prop 8 I’ve begun to see the stirrings of anger among progressives towards the overly careful Obama position on gay marriage. It’s unquestionably a fence-straddling position and a disappointingly outdated circa 2007-8 one at that. One hopes Obama will find some courage on this issue (we all know where he actually stands and is simply unwilling to engage this issue now for political reasons), but in the meantime advocates for marriage equality should be focusing their ire at the forces of reaction and retrenchment not obsessing on the caution of our allies (I’m looking at you John Aravosis).

The GOP has in recent months embraced every conceivable bogeyman in order to scare their base to the polls and many do so cynically for political advantage. From African American revanchists, communism, Islam, anchor babies and a general off-white menace, they’ve now once again begun to activate one of their old favorites — those afflicted with The Gay. I think hearing Newt Gingrich this last week demagoguing both the “Ground Zero Mosque” and the Prop 8 decision (while cutely tying it in with the vote on Kagan today) put me over the top on this. Gingrich doesn’t really care about either of these issues, but he cynically knows it will energize the reptile brains of the Republican base for the fall elections.

Let’s stay focused on the true enemy and not tie ourselves in knots when our politicians act like politicians. There is no moral equivalence between our side being pussies and their side being evil. And, yes, Nate Silver is right when he tweets, “In 30 years time, the fact that the Barack Obama was opposed to gay marriage is going to look really silly.”

PS-I’m not against pressuring Obama from the left on this and tons of other issues, but I think some on the left lose all sense of proportion when their leaders are too cautious.

Rupert Psmith filed this under:  
  1. Gherald says:

    While we should obviously welcome the judicial ruling, as pertains to the executive we should note that there are many other battles Obama has to fight today which are more pressing and that won't become easier with time.

    Thus the time for Obama to start taking a more liberal position and spending political capital on these kind of social/personal issues (gays, drugs) is December 2012.

    Because this stuff only becomes easier with time, and at the beginning of a second term he'll be free from electoral fence straddling considerations.

    • I agree, but with the small caveat that these things often take on their own momentum and a good politician will know when they need to move their position and that might very well be before the 2012 election. Certainly, there's no reason for him to make the move on marriage equity before the elections this fall. Right now he needs to put fire under the congress, after the recess, to get DADT repealed.

    • Metavirus says:

      i agree generally that a key opportunity to push for some of the more controversial issues is when he is no longer worried about being re-elected. it's too bad that politicians can't take the hard stances, or speak out without a filter, until there is no chance of them being in public service any longer (see, e.g., former congressman Bob Bennett)

  2. vjack says:

    Good points, although I would argue that Obama looks silly right now for holding bigoted views. I do not know him personally, so I have no idea what he really thinks about same-sex marriage and whether it is any different from his public statements. But yes, his public statements remind us daily that he is no progressive.

    • Metavirus says:

      i agree. it reminds me of listening to him when he talks about religion. i just don't buy it. i think he just calculated that the safest road to getting elected is looking churchy sometimes and buying in to the separate-but-equal equality copout.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Authors