Yglesias again:

My colleagues Matt Duss, Peter Juul, and Brian Kaplan have a memo out in which they try to tally up the full cost of Iraq—human, financial, and strategic—and discover that the price was very, very, very high.

I think this is important because I’ve developed a concern in the wake of the “surge” and the Obama administration’s embrace of counterinsurgency and General David Petraeus that some kind of cross-party conventional wisdom is going to emerge that Iraq was a tough fight with a couple of bad years, but ultimately a reasonable policy decision that worked out well enough. It wasn’t and it didn’t.

Again, the link is here. Never forget.

I don’t have a broader point, except maybe to note that Yglesias—perhaps the best, but certainly the most prolific of progressive bloggers—ought to be read regularly (feed URL).

Gherald filed this under:  
  1. Metavirus says:

    great posts today. this is exactly right on. yglesias is a very fair-minded blogger and his posts on urban infrastructure are pretty much unique (and wonderful!) in the blogging world.

  2. schu says:

    Trying to paint a failed oil war as cost effective is almost as bad as claiming that Viet Nam was a win.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Your Vintners