From the Times of London:

Brussels decrees holidays are a human right

An overseas holiday used to be thought of as a reward for a year’s hard work. Now Brussels has declared that tourism is a human right and pensioners, youths and those too poor to afford it should have their travel subsidised by the taxpayer.

Under the scheme, British pensioners could be given cut-price trips to Spain, while Greek teenagers could be taken around disused mills in Manchester to experience the cultural diversity of Europe.

The idea for the subsidised tours is the brainchild of Antonio Tajani, the European Union commissioner for enterprise and industry, who was appointed by Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister.

The scheme, which could cost hundreds of millions of pounds a year, is intended to promote a sense of pride in European culture, bridge the north-south divide in the continent and prop up resorts in their off-season.

Tajani, who unveiled his plan last week at a ministerial conference in Madrid, believes the days when holidays were a luxury have gone. “Travelling for tourism today is a right. The way we spend our holidays is a formidable indicator of our quality of life,” he said.

Tajani, who used to be transport commissioner, said he had been able to “affirm the rights of passengers” in his previous office and the next step was to ensure people’s “right to be tourists”.

I figure it’s only a matter of time before mainstream U.S. progressives start bemoaning our status as one of the few developed nations without a universal tourism right.

Gherald filed this under:  
  1. how dare you mock Tourism-Challenged-Americans?

  2. netcrusher88 says:

    Sorry, too busy bemoaning our status as the only developed nation without mandatory vacation, or mandatory paid maternity/bereavement leave.

  3. Metavirus says:

    loony. dead loony

  4. Metavirus says:

    by the way, this is yet another poignant moment to point out that, in any other western democracy, the U.S. Democrats would be considered a right-leaning centrist party, while the Republicans would be considered an extreme/fringe rightist/reactionary party. we truly do not have a leftist/social democrat/socialist party in this country. sure, the Dems flirt with it sometimes, but when given the chance to change things, they typically enact policies that Republicans would be happy with if they were sane (e.g., the recent health care reform law, which is basically a Republican model)

    • schu says:

      Yes, any chance of such a party was killed in the great "Red Scare" in the 40's and 50's.

    • well both parties have bigger tents than multi party systems in europe.

      here democrats have from dennis kucinich to ben nelson, and republicans have from snowe to bachmann

      i know the usual concept of us having a center that is to the right of other western countries, but its not as much as some would have you believe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Your Vintners