Most everyone who regularly reads Library Grape knows what a dim view I have of the median IQ of most Americans.
One of the factors that helps drive my belief that somewhere around three-quarters of the people in this country are barely-evolved, easily-led sheeple is the fact that lots of them are so easily bamboozled by bullshit industry front groups that pass themselves off as the voice of ever-so-concerned real Americans (see, astroturf).
In that vein, yours truly received a plaintive missive from someone passing himself off as a terribly concerned citizen, railing at me to stop New York’s proposed beverage tax. Note all the effort to make the email seem personal and heartfelt (emphasis all mine):
My name is Joseph. I’m contacting you today on behalf of nobeveragetaxes.com to bring an urgent issue to your attention. Americans are up against legislation that may implement a food and beverage tax on sugary foods and beverages. For some products, it would increase the price by as much as 50%. Additional burden will be placed on families and businesses already struggling in this trying economy. Ultimately, thousands of jobs related to the sugar industry will be at risk. New York State alone stands to lose up to 6,000 jobs. If this happens, how will our economy get back on track? [...]It goes on with more treacly nonsense for a while. The tone of the email, and the obvious front-group-fraud it was perpetrating, prompted me to do a bit of research.As citizens, it is our responsibility to let our officials know that the solution to childhood obesity relies in education, not taxation, and that punitive, discriminatory taxes will only hurt hard-working Americans. I’m hoping you’ll join me in voicing the statement, No Food and Beverage Taxes! before it’s too late.
First, a quick whois search revealed that the website in question is registered to a company in Washington D.C. named Goddard Claussen:
Registrant: Goddard ClaussenSue Zoldak701 8th St NW Suite 400Washington, DC 20001USPhone: +1.2022935870Email: [email protected]
National advocacy advertising didn’t just happen. It was invented. And we invented it in the early ‘90′s with the fictional couple – “Harry and Louise” – created to give a clear, unified voice to those who opposed President Clinton’s sweeping health care proposal. The unique campaign, managed by Goddard Claussen, caught the attention of the media, the White House and the American people. A year later, “Harry and Louise” earned a spot on Advertising Age’s prestigious “Marketing 100” and was named the Best Public Policy Campaign by the American Association of Political Consultants. It’s widely credited as being the key factor in defeating the Clinton Health Plan.Now, I’m not saying that companies and industries aren’t supposed to be able to fight for what’s in their own interest, i.e., more profits.
I just take serious exception to all the bullshit corporate astroturfing that is going on right now, in which corporations hide their self-advocacy behind a series of smokescreens that paint an image of real grassroots anger about some particular issue.
And the really serious thing that pisses me off is that this thinly veiled bullshit works.
People really are stupid enough to think that emails like the one I got express the genuine concerns of a fellow citizen, rather than the perfectly valid push by an industry group to protect its members’ profits.
I’m not sure that we’re ever truly going to evolve beyond the state humanity finds itself in today.
Update: I thought Joseph would like to know that I responded to his request and created a blog post on the topic he is so concerned about. So I sent him back the below email (and CC’ed the entire leadership team at Goddard Claussen):
Hi Joseph,Thanks for your email. As you requested, I posted a thought-provoking blog entry about the important issue raised by your email. I hope you’ll check it out at http://www.librarygrape.com/
2010/03/beverage-industry- . I’ve also copied it in below for your convenience. I hope this post (on my popular and widely-read blog) will generate a lot of attention to the issue that underlies the work that you are doing.shill-firm-goddard.html Metavirus @ Library Grape
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Snack Food
Politico parodies itself (via): The Senate, once the chamber of deliberation and reason, is getting its own extreme makeover. Moderates such as Maine Republican Olympia Snowe and Democrat Ben Nelson are bolting an institution that barely resembles the one they entered as idealistic deal makers. Ben Nelson? Idealistic dealmaker? These are words that should not be in the ... (1 comments)Despicable Quote of the Day - Icky Gay Sexytime Is A Threat To National Security
“Given the propensity for members of the homosexual community to engage in frequent and anonymous sexual encounters, the risk to national security of having a homosexual in a high-ranking position with access to secret information is obvious.” Bryan Fischer, Nutbag (0 comments)Newsweek Hearts America. Seriously. They Really F*cking Mean It.
I guess a cover featuring Uncle Sam hungrily masturbating to a painting of Jesus wearing an American flag was deemed to be insufficiently patriotic.[Embiggen]
(1 comments)Paul Ryan Suddenly Realizes That Ayn Rand Was A Rabid Atheist
Republicans Cave Again: Student Loans Edition
Mississippi: A Shining Example Of Limited Government
Ah, the land of Mississippi – that shining bastion of God-fearing, limited-government conservatism. Well, unless you want to father illegitimate babies — then the government will throw you in jail. (5 comments)Over in the UK, Labour is now up big over the ruling Tories. Part of that is almost certainly a stalled, ailing economy, but what’s sort of interesting because a big part of their drop is due to implementing a cap on charitable deductions, which is essentially what Obama wanted to do here to cut ... (0 comments)Death Penalty Loses Another One
Connecticut ends the practice. I have to say, this is one of those social movements that is regularly winning big victories, but almost nobody seems to be paying attention. Which is fine by me–under the wire is probably the best way for this thing to go for now. (0 comments)Look, Mitt, I know you want to get women back on your side, but the notion that women have lost 92.3% of jobs in the recession may be technically correct in some manipulated and spun context, but it’s not correct, and it’s not even a good bullshit statistic. You might have been able to get ... (0 comments)What Do You Want Schwarzenegger To Write About In His Memoirs?
The Santorum Has Officially Been Mopped Up In The 2012 Race
I think this gets it right. Additionally, though, while I find Rick Santorum’s beliefs to be pretty risible, and his inability to accept that his ideas had some less-than-ideal results during the ’00s is a personal failing, but at the very least he seemed to possess some sense of personal honor and integrity. Not as good as ... (0 comments)I hadn’t used Instagram because I’m not so much a pictures sort of guy, but an article in the SF Chronicle article makes an interesting point that they were a much bigger threat to Zuckerburg’s empire than the other commonly named competitors. (0 comments)Fun Friday: Robocop Is Filmed In Front Of A Live Studio Audience
Esteemed Wineries
- American Times
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Atheist Revolution
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Palin Watch
- Pharyngula
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- Washington Monthly
THE GRAPEVINE
Popular Vintages
Tasting Menu
- Welcome To The Machine
- Image of the Week: Homescholers For Perry
- Anti-Defamation League Piles On To Culturally Toxic Opposition to New York Mosque
- GOP Pol: Cries of Socialism Didn't Work, On To Fascism!
- Please Join The Conversation on Economic vs. Personal Liberty!
- Sen. Corker Channels McArdle and Gherald
- Today In The Center Right Nation
- Quote of the Day
- Remembering Andrew Breitbart
- NRO Blogger Apologizes to Publius for Outing Him
Wine Labels
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorPost Cellar
- May 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (42)
- March 2012 (64)
- February 2012 (71)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (63)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)

(

Did you look at the nobeverages.com about us page? It lists many business who are coalition members. And the website invites individuals who think they'll be adversely affected by this proposed tax to join them.
What's wrong with a PR guy like Joseph contacting you on behalf of them?
Perhaps it's the wording of his contact email that you object to. But I don't know what the specifics of that objection would be. So put yourself in Joseph's shoes for a moment… could you rewrite his contact email to what you think he should have said instead? It looks to me like he did a good job.
yeah, this is a great way to describe themselves " New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes is a coalition of concerned New Yorkers – hard working individuals, struggling families, and already burdened small businesses – opposed to any tax increases on juice drinks and soda."
The many businesses, associations, and franchises listed on the about page aren't small enough for you? The many individuals and families who work for and do business with them aren't good enough for you? And those who've "joined" this site are--what, exactly? No good, too?
Omitted from the description is any mention of how large some of the other coalition members are. Obviously they don't want to advertise this, they'd rather put their best face forward. This is standard operating procedure anywhere you look, from magazine ads and television commercials to retail politics or the makeup most women wear every day. OMG, lies!!!11
(by the way, if I lived in New York I'd certainly join this coalition. Thankfully I have no plans to live in New York any time soon; their governance and nanny statism like these proposed beverage taxes is the really awful thing here…certainly many orders of magnitude more awful than whatever objections you have to this coalition)
fair enough. we just look at this group from different perspectives i guess
What's wrong with this??? It's a lie. Like marketing candy bars as health food that help the rain forest and chimpanzees. Or the Taco Bell weight loss diet testimonial. Or Joe Camel cigarette ads targetting preschoolers. Or listing ingredients in cereal or drugs that aren't really in there, or adding stuff and not listing it. It's dishonest and in many cases illegal. It may work, it may influence, it may sell, they may be good at it like karl rove, it may look like a Joseph or Sally or Jim, but that doesn't make it true or right. It's corrupt. It's a lie.
I'm not sure how to respond to such inane trumped-up outrage.
I suppose an eye roll will have to do…
Alas, there is no cure for stupidity: ( http://contusio-cordis.blogspot.com/2009/11/gulli… ) You undoubtedly have heard the superb Tim Minchin explain this concept that fact and fiction are interchangable ( http://contusio-cordis.blogspot.com/2010/01/storm… ). As such, creating reality (a.k.a. rewriting history) through spin is entirely acceptable, if not mandatory, for any selfrespecting lobbyist/politician/anti-science mob.