Most everyone who regularly reads Library Grape knows what a dim view I have of the median IQ of most Americans.

One of the factors that helps drive my belief that somewhere around three-quarters of the people in this country are barely-evolved, easily-led sheeple is the fact that lots of them are so easily bamboozled by bullshit industry front groups that pass themselves off as the voice of ever-so-concerned real Americans (see, astroturf).

In that vein, yours truly received a plaintive missive from someone passing himself off as a terribly concerned citizen, railing at me to stop New York’s proposed beverage tax. Note all the effort to make the email seem personal and heartfelt (emphasis all mine):

My name is Joseph. I’m contacting you today on behalf of nobeveragetaxes.com to bring an urgent issue to your attention. Americans are up against legislation that may implement a food and beverage tax on sugary foods and beverages. For some products, it would increase the price by as much as 50%. Additional burden will be placed on families and businesses already struggling in this trying economy. Ultimately, thousands of jobs related to the sugar industry will be at risk. New York State alone stands to lose up to 6,000 jobs. If this happens, how will our economy get back on track? [...]

As citizens, it is our responsibility to let our officials know that the solution to childhood obesity relies in education, not taxation, and that punitive, discriminatory taxes will only hurt hard-working Americans. I’m hoping you’ll join me in voicing the statement, No Food and Beverage Taxes! before it’s too late.

It goes on with more treacly nonsense for a while. The tone of the email, and the obvious front-group-fraud it was perpetrating, prompted me to do a bit of research.

First, a quick whois search revealed that the website in question is registered to a company in Washington D.C. named Goddard Claussen:

Registrant: Goddard ClaussenSue Zoldak701 8th St NW Suite 400Washington, DC 20001USPhone: +1.2022935870Email: [email protected]
Next, a quick Google search revealed that Goddard Claussen is a powerhouse D.C. public relations firm that shills for all kinds of corporate interests. As it turns out, they were the groundbreaking PR firm that shilled for the health care industry in the 90s with their infamous “Harry and Louise” ads:
National advocacy advertising didn’t just happen. It was invented. And we invented it in the early ‘90′s with the fictional couple – “Harry and Louise” – created to give a clear, unified voice to those who opposed President Clinton’s sweeping health care proposal. The unique campaign, managed by Goddard Claussen, caught the attention of the media, the White House and the American people. A year later, “Harry and Louise” earned a spot on Advertising Age’s prestigious “Marketing 100” and was named the Best Public Policy Campaign by the American Association of Political Consultants. It’s widely credited as being the key factor in defeating the Clinton Health Plan.
Now, I’m not saying that companies and industries aren’t supposed to be able to fight for what’s in their own interest, i.e., more profits.

I just take serious exception to all the bullshit corporate astroturfing that is going on right now, in which corporations hide their self-advocacy behind a series of smokescreens that paint an image of real grassroots anger about some particular issue.

And the really serious thing that pisses me off is that this thinly veiled bullshit works.

People really are stupid enough to think that emails like the one I got express the genuine concerns of a fellow citizen, rather than the perfectly valid push by an industry group to protect its members’ profits.

I’m not sure that we’re ever truly going to evolve beyond the state humanity finds itself in today.

Update: I thought Joseph would like to know that I responded to his request and created a blog post on the topic he is so concerned about. So I sent him back the below email (and CC’ed the entire leadership team at Goddard Claussen):

Hi Joseph,

Thanks for your email. As you requested, I posted a thought-provoking blog entry about the important issue raised by your email. I hope you’ll check it out at http://www.librarygrape.com/2010/03/beverage-industry-shill-firm-goddard.html . I’ve also copied it in below for your convenience. I hope this post (on my popular and widely-read blog) will generate a lot of attention to the issue that underlies the work that you are doing.

Metavirus @ Library Grape

  1. Gherald says:

    Did you look at the nobeverages.com about us page? It lists many business who are coalition members. And the website invites individuals who think they'll be adversely affected by this proposed tax to join them.

    What's wrong with a PR guy like Joseph contacting you on behalf of them?

    Perhaps it's the wording of his contact email that you object to. But I don't know what the specifics of that objection would be. So put yourself in Joseph's shoes for a moment… could you rewrite his contact email to what you think he should have said instead? It looks to me like he did a good job.

    • Metavirus says:

      yeah, this is a great way to describe themselves " New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes is a coalition of concerned New Yorkers – hard working individuals, struggling families, and already burdened small businesses – opposed to any tax increases on juice drinks and soda."

      • Gherald says:

        The many businesses, associations, and franchises listed on the about page aren't small enough for you? The many individuals and families who work for and do business with them aren't good enough for you? And those who've "joined" this site are--what, exactly? No good, too?

        Omitted from the description is any mention of how large some of the other coalition members are. Obviously they don't want to advertise this, they'd rather put their best face forward. This is standard operating procedure anywhere you look, from magazine ads and television commercials to retail politics or the makeup most women wear every day. OMG, lies!!!11

        (by the way, if I lived in New York I'd certainly join this coalition. Thankfully I have no plans to live in New York any time soon; their governance and nanny statism like these proposed beverage taxes is the really awful thing here…certainly many orders of magnitude more awful than whatever objections you have to this coalition)

  2. Chunzilla says:

    What's wrong with this??? It's a lie. Like marketing candy bars as health food that help the rain forest and chimpanzees. Or the Taco Bell weight loss diet testimonial. Or Joe Camel cigarette ads targetting preschoolers. Or listing ingredients in cereal or drugs that aren't really in there, or adding stuff and not listing it. It's dishonest and in many cases illegal. It may work, it may influence, it may sell, they may be good at it like karl rove, it may look like a Joseph or Sally or Jim, but that doesn't make it true or right. It's corrupt. It's a lie.

  3. Nescio says:

    Alas, there is no cure for stupidity: ( http://contusio-cordis.blogspot.com/2009/11/gulli… ) You undoubtedly have heard the superb Tim Minchin explain this concept that fact and fiction are interchangable ( http://contusio-cordis.blogspot.com/2010/01/storm… ). As such, creating reality (a.k.a. rewriting history) through spin is entirely acceptable, if not mandatory, for any selfrespecting lobbyist/politician/anti-science mob.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Your Vintners