Regardless of how successful he has been at pulling the wool over people’s eyes, Scott Brown appears to be a certifiable rightwing nut. In addition to supporting torture, here he is in the long-ago days of 2008 opining on whether Obama was a child born out of wedlock:
As was first reported by Blue Mass Group, a Massachusetts-based political blog, Brown did an interview in 2008, around the time of Republican National Convention, to defend Sarah Palin as a candidate for national office. The interviewer raised the issue of the Alaska governor’s family, so the conservative state senator decided to go after Barack Obama’s parents.
“Barack’s mom had him when she was, what, 18 years old?” Brown asked, drawing a parallel between Obama’s mother and Palin’s pregnant teenage daughter. When the interviewer noted that Obama’s parents were married, Brown replied, “Well, I don’t know about that.”
The context is important here — around the time of the interview, unhinged right-wing activists were pushing the line that Obama’s parents weren’t married, a claim that became central to the bizarre Birther conspiracy theory. Brown wasn’t just attacking the future president and his parents during the interview; he was also lending credence to fringe right-wing stupidity.
Nice pick there, Gherald.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Snack Food
Politico parodies itself (via): The Senate, once the chamber of deliberation and reason, is getting its own extreme makeover. Moderates such as Maine Republican Olympia Snowe and Democrat Ben Nelson are bolting an institution that barely resembles the one they entered as idealistic deal makers. Ben Nelson? Idealistic dealmaker? These are words that should not be in the ... (1 comments)Despicable Quote of the Day - Icky Gay Sexytime Is A Threat To National Security
“Given the propensity for members of the homosexual community to engage in frequent and anonymous sexual encounters, the risk to national security of having a homosexual in a high-ranking position with access to secret information is obvious.” Bryan Fischer, Nutbag (0 comments)Newsweek Hearts America. Seriously. They Really F*cking Mean It.
I guess a cover featuring Uncle Sam hungrily masturbating to a painting of Jesus wearing an American flag was deemed to be insufficiently patriotic.[Embiggen]
(1 comments)Paul Ryan Suddenly Realizes That Ayn Rand Was A Rabid Atheist
Republicans Cave Again: Student Loans Edition
Mississippi: A Shining Example Of Limited Government
Ah, the land of Mississippi – that shining bastion of God-fearing, limited-government conservatism. Well, unless you want to father illegitimate babies — then the government will throw you in jail. (5 comments)Over in the UK, Labour is now up big over the ruling Tories. Part of that is almost certainly a stalled, ailing economy, but what’s sort of interesting because a big part of their drop is due to implementing a cap on charitable deductions, which is essentially what Obama wanted to do here to cut ... (0 comments)Death Penalty Loses Another One
Connecticut ends the practice. I have to say, this is one of those social movements that is regularly winning big victories, but almost nobody seems to be paying attention. Which is fine by me–under the wire is probably the best way for this thing to go for now. (0 comments)Look, Mitt, I know you want to get women back on your side, but the notion that women have lost 92.3% of jobs in the recession may be technically correct in some manipulated and spun context, but it’s not correct, and it’s not even a good bullshit statistic. You might have been able to get ... (0 comments)What Do You Want Schwarzenegger To Write About In His Memoirs?
The Santorum Has Officially Been Mopped Up In The 2012 Race
I think this gets it right. Additionally, though, while I find Rick Santorum’s beliefs to be pretty risible, and his inability to accept that his ideas had some less-than-ideal results during the ’00s is a personal failing, but at the very least he seemed to possess some sense of personal honor and integrity. Not as good as ... (0 comments)I hadn’t used Instagram because I’m not so much a pictures sort of guy, but an article in the SF Chronicle article makes an interesting point that they were a much bigger threat to Zuckerburg’s empire than the other commonly named competitors. (0 comments)Fun Friday: Robocop Is Filmed In Front Of A Live Studio Audience
Esteemed Wineries
- American Times
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Atheist Revolution
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Palin Watch
- Pharyngula
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- Washington Monthly
THE GRAPEVINE
Popular Vintages
Tasting Menu
- Bristol Palin Dumps Baby Daddy
- Dark Storm Gathering - Showers of Men Expected
- Go, Obama, Go!
- En Route To Denounce Privacy Rights, Rand Paul Erupts About TSA Violating His Privacy Rights
- Nope, Christian Rock Isn't Derivative In The Slightest!
- Why Are Web Ads Still So Dumb?
- Overlaying Hilarious Nonsense On A Star Trek Video
- Janelle Monáe - Tightrope
- Ahmadinejad Heckled and Mocked Leaving Mosque - Video
- Big Majority of Doctors, American People Want Public Option
Wine Labels
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorPost Cellar
- May 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (42)
- March 2012 (64)
- February 2012 (71)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (63)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)

(

So to review, he's defending Palin regarding her daughter's pregnancy, draws a parallel to Obama's mother's early pregnancy, and responds he doesn't know whether she was married?
This is beyond the pale because…some right-wingers think Obama isn't a natural-born American citizen? A claim founded in nothing but unhinged hysteria which certainly doesn't turn on whether his parents were married?
I see the straws are being firmly grasped.
Why not mention Brown's hatred for rape victims while you're at it?
That's ok. I know that once you make a decision you're hard pressed tobe persuaded otherwise.
I knew his position on waterboarding before I made my decision, which is based on my thinking that this will be inconsequential with a Democrat in the White House and that he might just be saying it because it's the mainstream Republican position and this is not a time to buck his party.
I didn't know about the above comments from the 2008 campaign and don't see why they would persuade anyone of anything.
Just to review, your position here is that a Republican who by his voting record is more liberal than Dede Scozzafava, and more liberal than 2/3 of Massachusetts Republicans--who are already nearly the most liberal Republicans in the country--is a "certifiable rightwing nut".
I knew you'd trended to the left, but I hadn't realize you'd gone far enough out there for Brown to seem a wingnut.
Just saw Obama's speech in Mass. supporting Martha and making the distinction between the candidates very clear. Excellent.
Whatever you say G
settle this with a duel….
but really, I dont think Brown is a wingnut. If he were to win, Im sure hed be the most liberal senate republican.
dont get me wrong though; of course Martha Coakley is the way to go!
I doubt that very much. I suspect he is playing like a moderate to get elected.
why would he do that? to serve 1 term? he has to be as moderate as he can or will lose re-election.
but come to think of it, I think he'd lose re-election no matter what he does.
If he pulls this off, he could be at or next to the top of the ticket eventually.
Precisely!
Oh jeez
heh,
Captain Crunch and Silly Rabbit for 2016
I guess anythings possible
From the party that brought you Sarah Palin….. >_>