A number of people, including our host, are interested in Israelifying U.S. airports. Megan McArdle forwards along an Israeli’s comment on why this won’t work:

1. Scale

Scale is an issue, but nobody in the thread has touched on why. The Israeli security model is (as noted in the article) more about the passenger than their baggage. This approach is both effective, time-consuming, and “racist”: the profilers have a conversation with each passenger; as I’m an Israeli Jew, I always get the abbreviated treatment — focusing more on where my bags have been since I’ve packed them. As a foreigner, you get a much more in-depth grilling. As a Muslim? They want to know your shoe size, and then a whole ‘nother screener comes over and asks you everything all over again, just to see that you keep your story straight. Like they say in the article, the conversations they have are not so much about what you say as how you say it. The screeners are taught to iterate a few levels deep into your story and see that it doesn’t break down under scrutiny.

Naturally, this process supposes that A) the threat is foreign and mostly limited to one ethnic/religious group, and B) screeners have this sort of time.

In the US, racial profiling is… unpalatable, and if each passenger / family got even a perfunctory 1-minute Q&A session with a TSA security officer, the system would crash. The US is dealing with a larger threat profile, and a whole different order-of-magnitude of traffic.

2. The security screener’s job: manpower, training, history

Normally these are intelligent men and women, usually students or twentysomethings, who pass a series of exams and then pass a several-month course. The hours are craptastic but the pay is decent, and a lot of students prefer it to shiftwork or waitressing. Passing the course is difficult but not arduous, and in the end you are really being taught guidelines on interrogation and then set loose to use your judgment — if you have a red flag to raise, then you just call over a senior screener who has more years of experience.

The reality is that there are few enough openings that the program can be selective. I’d say, as a generalization, screeners here possess above-average intelligence, whereas your average TSA screener seems to be a working stiff, blindly following some not-too-complex screening algorithm in a three-ring binder. The number of screeners requisite for staffing all of the US airports precludes the TSA from exclusively employing screeners with the ability to make “judgment calls”. There just aren’t enough smart people with the desire to work a screener’s job in the US.

Gherald filed this under:  
  1. Metavirus says:

    aww, that's why we love you gherald :)

  2. Metavirus says:

    facebook comment on this: "last time i was in israel, the mall had better security screening than most airports…."

  3. Dan Gilbert says:

    I really like the two articles on this topic. It would be a wonderful system, but (sadly) like Gherald says, the screening job most likely wouldn't appeal to those in the US who would have the aptitude for it.

    It almost seems that our airport security is insufficient because of our reliance on technology as opposed to human methods. I remember (I think around 9/11, but I'm not sure) hearing about our national intelligence community having the same problem. Our intelligence was coming more from high tech tools (satellites, wiretaps, etc) than it was from human intelligence work and because of that, we lost the in-depth information that we used to get when we had more "feet on the ground" so to speak.

    I don't know if it's true or not, but I found the idea interesting and noteworthy. The airport situation reminded me of it.

    • Metavirus says:

      Agreed.  All views on this topic are pretty interesting, even though the best and simplest approach is for Americans to stop being so g-d delicate and fragile!  Shit is going to happen.  Guaranteed.  Deal with it, for fuxake!

      • schu says:

        While you have a valid point, most Americans deal with their problems emotionally. The president must be perfect, always right, and popular or he is vial. Their is no middle ground. This is also the major problem with the GOP. In their view point you either support every thing that we do or you are the enemy. No discussion, no debate, no questions, just the party line or the highway.

  4. schu says:

    In this case Gherald has a valid point. The number of airports and passengers in the USA means that any security aspect is a bureaucratic nightmare. Besides the fact that major components of Israel's response is air marshals and retaliation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Authors