Ross Douthat gets it:

Obama baffles observers, I suspect, because he’s an ideologue and a pragmatist all at once. He’s a doctrinaire liberal who’s always willing to cut a deal and grab for half the loaf. He has the policy preferences of a progressive blogger, but the governing style of a seasoned Beltway wheeler-dealer.

[..] Absent political constraints, Obama would probably side with the liberal line on almost every issue. It’s just that he’s more acutely conscious of the limits of his powers and less willing to start fights that he might lose than many supporters would prefer. In this regard, he most resembles Ronald Reagan and Edward Kennedy. Both were highly ideological politicians who trained themselves to work within the system. Both preferred cutting deals to walking away from the negotiating table.

Gherald filed this under:  
  1. vjack says:

    I don't know if I agree with this. What bothers me most about Obama (aside from the fact that Dick Cheney is still not behind bars) is that he is not making it clear to the progressive community that he's even trying. On health care, to pick one example, he didn't even try for the single payer approach that makes far more sense than any of the other options. If this was because he didn't think the votes would be there, then explain that to us. Instead, he ends up making himself look a few steps right of center.

    • schu says:

      While I do not follow blind hero worship I would like to defend the president a bit. There is no way that the insurance companies would have allowed the single payer plan to pass, And yes they have enough money and clout to have tied up the debate for decades. Politics is the art of compromise, so that we do not actually have a series of civil wars and juntas as other counties do. This is the best we can do for right now. Now we must work at removing the Blue Dogs and the Bought and payed for insurance companies representative in congress, like Joe Lieberman. Then we can amend the laws to get what we need. This had to be done with social security and medicare. I really doubt that you will see Cheney behind US jail bars. However it is almost as good to see all the military reports that disagreed with his methods to continually point out that he is almost as big of an idiot as Rumstead.

  2. Metavirus says:

    i'm still ambivalent on this analysis so far. the proof will be in the pudding with what gets accomplished in his first term. i generally agree that anyone that thought he was a radical liberal with a yearning to get in there with a jackhammer and bodily tear down the walls of corruption and incompetence in washington was either a rightwing or leftwing kool aid drinker.

    however, his agenda is decidedly progressive and has left himself a lot of wiggleroom in the margins as to how stuff gets implemented. the fact is that washington is really broken right now, with its ugly, antiquated, procedural landscape being laid bare for us over the last many months. the republican minority's unprecedented use of the filibuster is going to make passing anything important that much worse because dipshits like lincoln and lieberman must be appeased to get over an undemocratic supermajority hurdle not present in other western democracies.

    so, we'll see the goods he delivers and how good they are. i am hopeful but less so than i was last year.

  3. schu says:

    Until the people can overcome the vested interests that continue to elect dipshits like lincoln and lieberman it will be a uphill battle. If the Democrats can manage to win more seats than they lose and give the wingnuts another black eye more progress can be made. This can only be done by continual voter registration and vote drives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Authors