(0 comments)I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, I really don’t understand why people are so squeamish about wishing pain and death upon truly despicable souls. After all, we wish a thousand sufferings upon Osama bin Laden, right? Why not also Rush Limbaugh? He is, after all, so deserving of your kindness and respect:
Limbaugh wonders “who’s paying for the Kennedy funeral”: “Is it Cutty Sark?”
Leave a Reply
Fast Food
Official Gingrich-Cain 2012 response to Rick Santorum’s homophobia: “Rick, Rick, Rick. Don’t you know that the anti-gay bigotry only carries water if you have a few failed straight marriages under your belt?” Follow all their other words of wisdom here. (0 comments)Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape
Here’s Grandpa Fustypants on rape and abortion:“If it’s an honest rape, that individual should go immediately to the emergency room, I would give them a shot of estrogen.”
via (4 comments)Unhinged vagina-shackler on Komen’s volte face:Cancer is Cancer! Aboration is Aboration!
(0 comments)Since it’s Mitt Romney week everywhere, I figured I’d post this op-ed by an ex-Mormon, which is a pretty interesting take at the institutional culture of the LDS church. Not much to say about it, but it’s definitely worth 5 or so minutes of your time. (0 comments)Why Bipartisanship Is Impossible, In One Sentence
When one party climbs back to power by promising action on the economy, does nothing on it, and instead spends literally all its time trying to hurt the other party. (0 comments)New From The Gingrich-Cain Front
Newt rants about cable movies he doesn’t like, and flips out when Herman tries to seize control. Catch all the fun here. And the main site is here, as always. (0 comments)Headline of the Week: Making Rapeanade
Leave it to TBogg:
(0 comments)Rick Santorum Suggests That When Life Gives You Rape, You Should Make Rapeanade Back when I was in junior high and the Clinton Impeachment was going on, I could hardly have imagined that Clinton would be used as an excuse for wrongdoing by Republican leaders. But that’s where we are. Interesting, isn’t it? (0 comments)Catch up with the official Gingrich-Cain “Great Statesmen” series over at @GingrichCain12. (0 comments)Only 65% of White Americans Have a Favorable Opinion of MLK Jr
…with a whimper. Drum is worth reading on this. I think he’s just got to be the most overhyped and overcovered guy who never managed better than third place since…Joe Lieberman? (0 comments)Mitt Romney's Overwhelming Inauthenticity
It’s amazing to me that Mitt Romney brings up France as a scary comparison point to himself so often when he spent years there and speaks the language. It’s such a minor point, but telling. Of all the people running for president, Mitt Romney has to be the most aware that the rightwing caricature of ... (0 comments)Mother Teresa Doesn't Deserve Sainthood
Case in point. It’s amazing how all the famous/respected Catholic figures from the 1990s have turned out to be incredibly corrupt, isn’t it? I’m sure they’re somehow connected. Of course, as I’m a Protestant I know little about such things. (1 comments)I Fixed It! Ban Sitting Politicians From Running For Another Office
Wonkette reminded me of one of the provisions that I want to write into my fantasy Constitution:No person who holds any elected office shall be permitted to seek election to any other office until he shall have permanently vacated his current post.
(2 comments)The Kardashians want their own magazine?
Unintentionally hilarious: “Bachmann, 55, told a small group of supporters Tuesday night that she was staying in the presidential race…”What other kind of group of Bachmann supporters could there be?(0 comments)Santorum Finishes #2, Sliding Down In The Final Minutes To Lose To Romney
DOWN THE VINE
Syndication
Typical liberal response to someones else's suffering.
1. Do they agree with the"progresive agenda" yes or no.
2. If yes, its a terrible thing to have lost such a brillant …, if no, they should burn in hell
there's compassion for ya!
Here back at ya
May Ted Kennedy, the murdering bastard, burn in hell
it has nothing to do with whether someone disagrees with me. it has everything to do with, as realist says, whether they were a hateful asshole (who did lots of evil things while they were alive) and as a result deserve to die a painful death (see, e.g., Idi Amin, Osama Bin Laden, Rush Limbaugh, Joe McCarthy, Timothy McVeigh, etc.)
Ps. Ted never murdered anyone. At most it was a drunken accident. Facts!
Several counter points.
1. Hatred is usually a wingnut position, along with torture.
2. Rush is a money grubbing skum sucker that is not worth such a strong emotion.
3. Why should a thinking person be compassionate to a money loving muckraker?
4. An then who did Kennedy murder? There was an accident that caused a death but not even the RNC was able to stretch it to a murder charge.
ANAYMOUS? is that supposed to be "anonymous"? In any case, the point you are addressing was addressed in his post. It's not a matter of whether one is progressive or not… it's more like, how much of a hateful A-hole is this person? Does he spread HATE and/or terror? And yes, Limbaugh does.
We have plenty of evidence that wingnuts spelling has a great deal to be desired. As does mine, but at least I do run a spell checker regularly.
And what is he doing in Hawaaii anyway? Stalking the president? Looking for fodder for his next spewfest?
I hope he DIES!
there I said and I feel ZERO;NADA;NO shame because had it been President Obama;or the First Lady and either of the First daughters Malia or Sasha who went to the Hospital;Rush Limbaugh would have scheduled a parade and his fellow Klan members would have been out partying it up!
Amen to that. Let it out.
So we emulate what he and his followers are and we become him in response?
Metavirus I am somewhat disappointed in you. While I know that you are not Christian displaying such a strong emotion as hatred to such a sick and depraved individual as Rush only emboldens and empowers him and his followers. It gives them the moral high ground that they cannot possibly gain in any other way. It is much better to point out how depraved, ignorant and inconsistent the lowlife skum sucker is than to waist a self defeating emotion like hatred on him.
How???????
How what????
I've always thought that it was a terrible evil to think good things about bad people. I've always felt that you should hope for bad things to happen to bad people and good things to happen to good people. IMO Rush is a very bad person. I hope for bad things to happen to him. He is the kind of sack of S#(! that makes me want very badly for their actually to be a heaven and a hell. "Cause any sane person damned well knows where he is going.
Once again you are being extremely judgmental. I can dislike a person, disagree with them, and point out what I thing are their errors with out hating them. If we digress into hatred we become what they are. This is one of the things that has happened to the GOP and they are paying the piper for it.
I couldn't care less about the asshole anyway.
One of my points, he is not worth such an emotion as hatred.
Hmm, I really don't buy into that line of thinking. I am a thinking man with a heart, and what I see him doing to our country truly pains me. I do hate him, and a handful of other people (e.g., Bush, Cheney, Beck, etc.), and I think they richly deserve it.
The problem with hate is that buildings have a tendency to explode, people are shot, innocents are harmed as incidental damage. I can deal with the idiots, even high powered idiots more than I can deal with the destroyers.
I really don't think about Rush very much, that's why I said what I did.