(0 comments)
One thing that I didn’t take away from the news reports today about Harry Reid’s announcement about the inclusion of a public option in the bill that will be presented to the Senate for a floor vote is this:
If the public option is only available to a tiny slice of the American people, this “economies of scale” argument gets dramatically weakened.
Just something to bear in mind while pondering the convoluted legislative goulash the spineless schmuck in charge of the Senate put out there today.
h/t to The Rachel Maddow Show and Senator Ron Wyden (from my home state of Oregon) for casting this in the light I describe above.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Fast Food
Official Gingrich-Cain 2012 response to Rick Santorum’s homophobia: “Rick, Rick, Rick. Don’t you know that the anti-gay bigotry only carries water if you have a few failed straight marriages under your belt?” Follow all their other words of wisdom here. (0 comments)Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape
Here’s Grandpa Fustypants on rape and abortion:“If it’s an honest rape, that individual should go immediately to the emergency room, I would give them a shot of estrogen.”
via (4 comments)Unhinged vagina-shackler on Komen’s volte face:Cancer is Cancer! Aboration is Aboration!
(0 comments)Since it’s Mitt Romney week everywhere, I figured I’d post this op-ed by an ex-Mormon, which is a pretty interesting take at the institutional culture of the LDS church. Not much to say about it, but it’s definitely worth 5 or so minutes of your time. (0 comments)Why Bipartisanship Is Impossible, In One Sentence
When one party climbs back to power by promising action on the economy, does nothing on it, and instead spends literally all its time trying to hurt the other party. (0 comments)New From The Gingrich-Cain Front
Newt rants about cable movies he doesn’t like, and flips out when Herman tries to seize control. Catch all the fun here. And the main site is here, as always. (0 comments)Headline of the Week: Making Rapeanade
Leave it to TBogg:
(0 comments)Rick Santorum Suggests That When Life Gives You Rape, You Should Make Rapeanade Back when I was in junior high and the Clinton Impeachment was going on, I could hardly have imagined that Clinton would be used as an excuse for wrongdoing by Republican leaders. But that’s where we are. Interesting, isn’t it? (0 comments)Catch up with the official Gingrich-Cain “Great Statesmen” series over at @GingrichCain12. (0 comments)Only 65% of White Americans Have a Favorable Opinion of MLK Jr
…with a whimper. Drum is worth reading on this. I think he’s just got to be the most overhyped and overcovered guy who never managed better than third place since…Joe Lieberman? (0 comments)Mitt Romney's Overwhelming Inauthenticity
It’s amazing to me that Mitt Romney brings up France as a scary comparison point to himself so often when he spent years there and speaks the language. It’s such a minor point, but telling. Of all the people running for president, Mitt Romney has to be the most aware that the rightwing caricature of ... (0 comments)Mother Teresa Doesn't Deserve Sainthood
Case in point. It’s amazing how all the famous/respected Catholic figures from the 1990s have turned out to be incredibly corrupt, isn’t it? I’m sure they’re somehow connected. Of course, as I’m a Protestant I know little about such things. (1 comments)I Fixed It! Ban Sitting Politicians From Running For Another Office
Wonkette reminded me of one of the provisions that I want to write into my fantasy Constitution:No person who holds any elected office shall be permitted to seek election to any other office until he shall have permanently vacated his current post.
(2 comments)The Kardashians want their own magazine?
Unintentionally hilarious: “Bachmann, 55, told a small group of supporters Tuesday night that she was staying in the presidential race…”What other kind of group of Bachmann supporters could there be?(0 comments)Santorum Finishes #2, Sliding Down In The Final Minutes To Lose To Romney
Blogroll
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Steve Benen @ Washington Monthly
- Ta-Nehisi
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- WTF Is It Now?!?
DOWN THE VINE
Popular Posts
- Overplaying Your Hand, Or Why John Boehner Is A Really Sucky House Speaker 0 comment(s)
- Mitch Daniels: The Latest Failure To Build A New McCain 4 comment(s)
- Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape 4 comment(s)
- Most Awesome Cake Ever 0 comment(s)
- Fox News Has a First Amendment Right to Lie – Updated 50 comment(s)
Grape Explorer
- Ron Paul: Crank To The Last
- As Republican Popularity Declines, Fox News Gets More Viewers
- Fun Friday
- Scott Brown's John Kerry Moment
- NRCC: Time for McChrystal to Put Pelosi "In Her Place"
- Video: Blagojevich Balls
- Racebaiting Finally Exacting Its Political Toll?
- GOP Losing the Hispanic Forest for the Sotomayor Trees
- Illinois Senator Roland Burris Committed Perjury
- Neoconservatism, and other creepy political movements I have known
Tags
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorArchives
- February 2012 (28)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (63)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)
Syndication



Sigh, as I said before, one of the biggest crooks and lairs in congress is in charge of dressing up something to look like a public option and sell it to the American public as health care reform.
And yet -- I think *any* option that stands outside the traditional health insurance complex stands to compete with it, especially because as more small businesses continue to drop or cut insurance they can no longer afford, and individuals drop out of insurance programs they can no longer afford (and this is an endemic pattern, now) -- these will also become eligible for the public option.
At the end of the day, a public option is so rigidly opposed by vested interests because it, alone, is the thing with the power to break the back of the insurance industry monoply over the American public. Almost any form of public option will ultimately achieve this, because any form is a foothold, and it is the crack in the door for future enhancements, amendments, expansions, etc. The industry is fighting tooth and claw to prevent that toehold, itself, because they know what it will portend.
So I say, to almost any form of public option: go team. It's the appropriate stick in the eye to the monopolistic insurance industry. Now in small measure, perhaps, but later, in greater (as long as progressives in Congress continue to fight for it and expand that toehold.)
[youtube ct-wRaP8TNY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ct-wRaP8TNY youtube]
So instead we allow the insurance industry to continue to rip off people, deny coverage, and continue with their own death panels? So that some spin doctor can continue to spin the insurance industries lies to the isinformed and uneducated?
So what? The issue of "mandatory" insurance and penalties and incentives surrounding it is entirely separate from the issue of whether or not a public option exists as an option, and the effect that lever has on the existing coverage monopoly.
Personally I'm opposed to the govt mandating the purchase of insurance. If it's affordable (and that is the key concept), most people will buy in, and if most people have insurance (because they are no longer denied or kicked out of programs by insurers, or lack access entirely), I don't buy the industry's argument that they can't afford to offer pre-existing condition coverage unless "everyone is required" to have insurance. That isn't the case in other countries that have public options, and it needn't be the case here.