... (0 comments)I am slow to the party on this one but the level of insanity that came out of the following Glenn Beck show is nearly too much for me:
I’ll let Wonkette encapsulate my overall reaction:
Well, this is sort of what we all imagined, in our darkest & drunkest moments. Here’s a Fox News show featuring a weird jabbering middle-aged baby with hair plugs on the left side of the screen and some guy who claims to be a Bush Administration-era anti-Bin Laden agent on the right, and, well, they both share a certain dream for America, which involves the nation being horribly attacked by Osama bin Laden’s secret arsenal of nuclear weapons, from Mexico. THAT WILL LEARN US, RIGHT?…Update: Here’s John Stewart’s riposte:We can either ignore this stuff, or we can embrace it, or we can look at it with compassion and then wonder, “What is up with these people? Why are they so crazy?”
Let’s go with the latter. Let’s first acknowledge that a certain portion of our nation has gone completely bonkers, and these overpaid clowns at Fox News (not you, Shep, we are with you!) are cruelly and deliberately exciting and exploiting the people who suffer the most when economic conditions are bad and the chasm of economic inequality is so deep and dark…
But, still, jesus fucking christ on a segway, we do not need FOX NEWS trying to excite the doomed with dreams of Osama bin Laden nuking America, on July 4th, to teach, uhm, Barack Obama a lesson.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Osama bin Laden Needs to Attack America | ||||
| www.thedailyshow.com | ||||
|
||||
Edit: title edited for accuracy.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Fast Food
Unhinged vagina-shackler on Komen’s volte face:Cancer is Cancer! Aboration is Aboration!
(0 comments)Since it’s Mitt Romney week everywhere, I figured I’d post this op-ed by an ex-Mormon, which is a pretty interesting take at the institutional culture of the LDS church. Not much to say about it, but it’s definitely worth 5 or so minutes of your time. (0 comments)Why Bipartisanship Is Impossible, In One Sentence
When one party climbs back to power by promising action on the economy, does nothing on it, and instead spends literally all its time trying to hurt the other party. (0 comments)New From The Gingrich-Cain Front
Newt rants about cable movies he doesn’t like, and flips out when Herman tries to seize control. Catch all the fun here. And the main site is here, as always. (0 comments)Headline of the Week: Making Rapeanade
Leave it to TBogg:
(0 comments)Rick Santorum Suggests That When Life Gives You Rape, You Should Make Rapeanade Back when I was in junior high and the Clinton Impeachment was going on, I could hardly have imagined that Clinton would be used as an excuse for wrongdoing by Republican leaders. But that’s where we are. Interesting, isn’t it? (0 comments)Catch up with the official Gingrich-Cain “Great Statesmen” series over at @GingrichCain12. (0 comments)Only 65% of White Americans Have a Favorable Opinion of MLK Jr
…with a whimper. Drum is worth reading on this. I think he’s just got to be the most overhyped and overcovered guy who never managed better than third place since…Joe Lieberman? (0 comments)Mitt Romney's Overwhelming Inauthenticity
It’s amazing to me that Mitt Romney brings up France as a scary comparison point to himself so often when he spent years there and speaks the language. It’s such a minor point, but telling. Of all the people running for president, Mitt Romney has to be the most aware that the rightwing caricature of ... (0 comments)Mother Teresa Doesn't Deserve Sainthood
Case in point. It’s amazing how all the famous/respected Catholic figures from the 1990s have turned out to be incredibly corrupt, isn’t it? I’m sure they’re somehow connected. Of course, as I’m a Protestant I know little about such things. (1 comments)I Fixed It! Ban Sitting Politicians From Running For Another Office
Wonkette reminded me of one of the provisions that I want to write into my fantasy Constitution:No person who holds any elected office shall be permitted to seek election to any other office until he shall have permanently vacated his current post.
(2 comments)The Kardashians want their own magazine?
Unintentionally hilarious: “Bachmann, 55, told a small group of supporters Tuesday night that she was staying in the presidential race…”What other kind of group of Bachmann supporters could there be?(0 comments)Santorum Finishes #2, Sliding Down In The Final Minutes To Lose To Romney
I was really hoping that Santorum would win the Iowa caucuses. The disgustingly puerile humor would have lasted for WEEKS! (0 comments)Good stuff: The National Labor Relations Board announced on Wednesday that it had adopted new rules that would speed up unionization elections, its last major policy decision before it drops to two members and can no longer make new decisions. It approved the rules in a 2-to-1 vote. The labor board said the new rules, which have ... (0 comments)A Dinosaur Infringed On A Patent For Rocks...
Reading this lead-in to an article today made me think of cavemen and dinosaurs:“The long-running antitrust suit Novell filed regarding Microsoft’s alleged tactics to prevent WordPerfect from running properly in Windows 95 seemed to be on the verge of conclusion…”
... (0 comments)Blogroll
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Steve Benen @ Washington Monthly
- Ta-Nehisi
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- WTF Is It Now?!?
DOWN THE VINE
Popular Posts
- Mitch Daniels: The Latest Failure To Build A New McCain 4 comment(s)
- How DARE YOU Politicize Our Decision To Politicize Breast Cancer! 2 comment(s)
- Fox News Has a First Amendment Right to Lie – Updated 50 comment(s)
- Why Mormonism Is Not Christianity, Briefly 6 comment(s)
- Just Like Suicide 0 comment(s)
Grape Explorer
- Why Gay Parents Chose A Catholic School For Their Kids
- Ryan's Plan sucks, but, where's the alternative? WHERE?!
- Men Six Times More Likely Than Women to Leave Spouse After Serious Illness Diagnosis
- If The US Doesn't Know Where Bin Laden Is, What Do We Do?
- Something Saint Megan and I Can Agree On: Republicans Not Ready To Lead
- So When Can Alan Grayson Become Speaker of the House?
- Tech Recommendation: Blackberry Curve 8900
- You Gotta Have Faith
- Obama Signals Gay Marriage Shift
- First health care, then abortion, then the EPA, and...jobs, sometime, maybe?
Tags
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorArchives
- February 2012 (11)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (62)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)
(


Once again it is situation ethics and any insanity to sell air time. Like the National Inquirer Fox will say anything and present any story to sell air time.
I dont see how either of them are "yearning" for an attack, what they meant is that they think obama is not in the so called "post-911 mentality", and they think only another attack will wake him up or whatever…they want their dream of a policed state that checks dogs and cats for bombs…
but still it was a stupid thing to say
hmm, i'm not so sure. if they're "yearning" for "their dream of a policed state that checks dogs and cats for bombs" and the best way they see to achieve this is to have another terrorist attack, it's fair to think that they're yearning for another terrorist attack
so if I have a friend that wont wear a seatbelt, and I tell him, the only thing that will wake you up is a car crash…does that mean I want him to have a car crash?
thats as far as im willing to defend him though…but I still dont want us to be reactionary in everything the opposition says…heck i dont like being reactionary period…
let's take this from a broader perspective. we're talking about the ultimate "means justify the ends" people here. we're talking about a neoconservative and quasi-neoconservative ideology that believes that "torture works" (i.e. violating cherished human rights and international law norms is justified because someone somewhere once got a piece of good intelligence from it) and the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives (and over 4,000 american military lives) was justified in an attempt to spread freedom to the middle east and secure Iraqi oil supplies. these are also the people (and the words of Beck's guest mirror this exactly) that believe that Obama is a weakling and that we need an omnipresent security state to keep us safe.
so, do I believe that these ultimate moral relativists — the ultimate "means justify the ends" people — believe that the sacrifice of a few thousand american civilians is "worth it" to somehow bring down the obama administration by blaming him for the attack and thereby push for an ever-more-crushing Orwellian security state (in order to keep us safe)?
yes, yes I do.
yes maybe thats what most neo cons believe, but we're talking about what beck's guest said(even there you made a mistake, it was his guest who said those words, not him, although he should of disagreed)
im just saying lets not assume we know exactly what they are thinking, from these words he said, I dont see how they actually wish for an attack…
but were never gonna agree so anyway… :)
i hear what you're saying. maybe i'm just too jaded. i do know that there are some really irresponsible nutjobs out there who will callously shrug off the death of innocent lives if it advances their agenda.
Talk about twisting a comment and taking it completely out of it's context…this is nearly too much propaganda for me to handle.
Now that is something that I find really surprising.