Richard Clark wrote a fantastic op-ed in the Washington Post:

[L]istening to Cheney and Rice, it seems that they want to be excused for the measures they authorized after the attacks on the grounds that 9/11 was traumatic. “If you were there in a position of authority and watched Americans drop out of eighty-story buildings because these murderous tyrants went after innocent people,” Rice said in her recent comments, “then you were determined to do anything that you could that was legal to prevent that from happening again.”

I have little sympathy for this argument. Yes, we went for days with little sleep, and we all assumed that more attacks were coming. But the decisions that Bush officials made in the following months and years — on Iraq, on detentions, on interrogations, on wiretapping — were not appropriate. Careful analysis could have replaced the impulse to break all the rules, even more so because the Sept. 11 attacks, though horrifying, should not have surprised senior officials. Cheney’s admission that 9/11 caused him to reassess the threats to the nation only underscores how, for months, top officials had ignored warnings from the CIA and the NSC staff that urgent action was needed to preempt a major al-Qaeda attack.

Thus, when Bush’s inner circle first really came to grips with the threat of terrorism, they did so in a state of shock — a bad state in which to develop a coherent response. Fearful of new attacks, they authorized the most extreme measures available, without assessing whether they were really a good idea.

Shorter Clark: 9/11 caused everyone in the Bush Administration to piss their pants and panic. In their panic, they invariably decided to go with the most extreme measures available, often without regard for the boundaries of the law.

Read the whole thing.

Share
{ 1 comment }
  1. Schu says:

    Of course they were scared, they new that they had screwed up badly when they but all their intelligence people on finding a justifiable reason to invade Iraq, and not on following the terrorists. To cover this they had to torture suspects to try and produce information to prove their claims, and of course that failed. Once again one has to ask the question, how many of the pilots involved in the 9/11 attack were Iraqi? Of course the answer is none.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *