(0 comments)
I’m a little late to the party but it looks like Obama is set to pick Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his pick for the Supreme Court:
President Obama has decided to nominate the federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, choosing a daughter of Puerto Rican parents raised in Bronx public housing projects to become the nation’s first Hispanic justice, officials said Tuesday.Thinking about the upcoming confirmation battle in the Senate, I anticipate the next few weeks being more painful than most — especially because the talking heads will likely spend 60-75% of their time talking about Judge Sotomayor’s race and gender. The Supreme Court has become one of the biggest lightning rods in Washington, which inevitably draws all the kooks out of the woodwork to make all kinds of wild claims and accusations. It’s really too bad because I share John Cole’s view of how SCOTUS picks should be evaluated:The decision, to be announced Tuesday morning, will be Mr. Obama’s first selection to the Supreme Court and could trigger a struggle with Senate Republicans who have indicated they may oppose the nomination. But Democrats control nearly the 60 votes necessary to choke off a filibuster and even Republicans said they have little hope of blocking confirmation barring unforeseen revelation.
Judge Sotomayor, 54, who has served for more than a decade on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals based in New York City, would become the nation’s 111th justice, replacing David H. Souter, who is retiring after 19 years on the bench. Although Justice Souter was appointed by the first President George Bush, he became a mainstay of the liberal faction on the court and so his replacement by Judge Sotomayor likely would not shift the overall balance of power.
What do I think about all this? Pretty much what I thought when Roberts and Alito were confirmed. A president deserves his picks, and unless they are incompetent or decidedly out of the mainstream or there is some exceptional reason to keep them off the bench, they should be confirmed. I’m sure lots of you disagree with that position, but that is what I think. Elections matter. Obama should get his picks.John also had this to say about the GOP’s strategy:
Politically, this pick is filled with land mines for Republicans, giving them the opportunity to sound like clods to hispanics and female voters, and given their remarkable tone-deafness the last couple of years, I’m sure they can manage to shave a few points off their already historically low popularity. Jeff Sessions should be a load of fun to watch. Additionally, because of the amount of time between when she was chosen and when Obama would like the vote to happen, it is going to be difficult for them to drag their feet the way they want to. For Republicans, the calculus is drag this out as long as possible, make it as ugly as possible, and hope it gets the base to give money.Update: Steve Benen highlights a salient point:
This morning at the White House, when President Obama introduced Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his Supreme Court nominee, he noted that he’d like to see the Senate act swiftly on her nomination — as they have “twice before.”Update 2: Wasting no time in getting the Stoopid kicked up into high gear, here’s a statement from the rightwing Judicial [Anti-]Confirmation Network:It was a reminder that when Sotomayor sits before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and her nomination heads to the Senate floor, it won’t be the first time these lawmakers have consider her qualifications for the federal bench.
In 1998, the Senate confirmed Sotomayor for the court of appeals, 67 to 29. Every Democrat voted in support — yes, that means you too, Ben Nelson — and as Eric Kleefeld noted this morning, seven Republican senators who are still in the chamber also voted for Sotomayor’s conformation.
Judge Sotomayor is a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important that the law as written. She thinks that judges should dictate policy, and that one’s sex, race, and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench.See those references to “sex, race and ethnicity”? To steal a bit from Wonkette: “Translation: a radical leftist lesbian radical who will take away your guns, force your children into kindergarten abortion parties, exhume the corpse of Ronald Reagan for the purposes of urinating on it, and surrender in Iraq.”
Update 3: As a final thought, I hope everyone bears in mind that 98% of the attacks the GOP will be leveling against Judge Sotomayor would be the exact same attacks they would be using against any other Obama nominee (short of Robert Bork). All that matters to them is that she’s not conservative and likely does not support criminalizing abortion.
Update 4: It looks like the RNC’s Official Talking Points (TM) on the nomination have been leaked.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Fast Food
Official Gingrich-Cain 2012 response to Rick Santorum’s homophobia: “Rick, Rick, Rick. Don’t you know that the anti-gay bigotry only carries water if you have a few failed straight marriages under your belt?” Follow all their other words of wisdom here. (0 comments)Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape
Here’s Grandpa Fustypants on rape and abortion:“If it’s an honest rape, that individual should go immediately to the emergency room, I would give them a shot of estrogen.”
via (4 comments)Unhinged vagina-shackler on Komen’s volte face:Cancer is Cancer! Aboration is Aboration!
(0 comments)Since it’s Mitt Romney week everywhere, I figured I’d post this op-ed by an ex-Mormon, which is a pretty interesting take at the institutional culture of the LDS church. Not much to say about it, but it’s definitely worth 5 or so minutes of your time. (0 comments)Why Bipartisanship Is Impossible, In One Sentence
When one party climbs back to power by promising action on the economy, does nothing on it, and instead spends literally all its time trying to hurt the other party. (0 comments)New From The Gingrich-Cain Front
Newt rants about cable movies he doesn’t like, and flips out when Herman tries to seize control. Catch all the fun here. And the main site is here, as always. (0 comments)Headline of the Week: Making Rapeanade
Leave it to TBogg:
(0 comments)Rick Santorum Suggests That When Life Gives You Rape, You Should Make Rapeanade Back when I was in junior high and the Clinton Impeachment was going on, I could hardly have imagined that Clinton would be used as an excuse for wrongdoing by Republican leaders. But that’s where we are. Interesting, isn’t it? (0 comments)Catch up with the official Gingrich-Cain “Great Statesmen” series over at @GingrichCain12. (0 comments)Only 65% of White Americans Have a Favorable Opinion of MLK Jr
…with a whimper. Drum is worth reading on this. I think he’s just got to be the most overhyped and overcovered guy who never managed better than third place since…Joe Lieberman? (0 comments)Mitt Romney's Overwhelming Inauthenticity
It’s amazing to me that Mitt Romney brings up France as a scary comparison point to himself so often when he spent years there and speaks the language. It’s such a minor point, but telling. Of all the people running for president, Mitt Romney has to be the most aware that the rightwing caricature of ... (0 comments)Mother Teresa Doesn't Deserve Sainthood
Case in point. It’s amazing how all the famous/respected Catholic figures from the 1990s have turned out to be incredibly corrupt, isn’t it? I’m sure they’re somehow connected. Of course, as I’m a Protestant I know little about such things. (1 comments)I Fixed It! Ban Sitting Politicians From Running For Another Office
Wonkette reminded me of one of the provisions that I want to write into my fantasy Constitution:No person who holds any elected office shall be permitted to seek election to any other office until he shall have permanently vacated his current post.
(2 comments)The Kardashians want their own magazine?
Unintentionally hilarious: “Bachmann, 55, told a small group of supporters Tuesday night that she was staying in the presidential race…”What other kind of group of Bachmann supporters could there be?(0 comments)Santorum Finishes #2, Sliding Down In The Final Minutes To Lose To Romney
Blogroll
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Steve Benen @ Washington Monthly
- Ta-Nehisi
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- WTF Is It Now?!?
DOWN THE VINE
Popular Posts
- Overplaying Your Hand, Or Why John Boehner Is A Really Sucky House Speaker 0 comment(s)
- Mitch Daniels: The Latest Failure To Build A New McCain 4 comment(s)
- Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape 4 comment(s)
- Most Awesome Cake Ever 0 comment(s)
- Fox News Has a First Amendment Right to Lie – Updated 50 comment(s)
Grape Explorer
- Why Do Christians Ask Atheists "So What Do You Think Happens When You Die!?"
- I Say No Thank You To The Alternative Universe Where Clinton Is President
- Historians Agree: Bush Among Worst Presidents
- Toast Miraculously Spotted On Jesus
- Surprising LGBT Rights Supporter Of The Day: Toby Keith
- Spain Opens Criminal Probe of Bush Torture Program
- New Job Loss Figures are Scary
- Nerds vs. the Westboro Baptist Church
- Ron Paul Calls Newtie A Draft-Dodging Chickenhawk
- How Does It Feel To Be A Budget Cut?
Tags
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorArchives
- February 2012 (28)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (63)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)
Syndication



I would hope they do freak out, the woman is clearly a sexist/racist. By claiming her hope that her race makes her produce better opinions than whites she presents a clear-cut case of racism as defined in any relevant dictionary – seeing your abilities as superior to others simply because of your race. Also sexism in hoping that as a woman she is inherently superior with some magical ability that allows her to reach "better" conclusions than males.
Not that it matters, spineless Republicans are too busy worrying about the Hispanic vote while Democrats are busy applauding her for holding these racist/sexist views. No doubt the Democrats would be doing back flips if a white male had said anything resembling her comment, but hypocrisy in that party is nothing new.
Hopefully some day the racists/sexists who support such discriminatory thinking against whites will join us in the 21st century. Until then, they're just perpetuating racism, sexism, and resentment.
please, i encourage you to go out and get rush and hannity and ingraham and everyone you can think of to spew this man-hater, white-hater nonsense. by all means, make this about gender and race. scream about it all day long, write letters to the editor. i'm sure that will do great things for your efforts to recast the republican party as something other than the party of southern white males. good luck with that.
This is the newest wave of bigotry in action, that false attack. By charging someone as racist, they hope to draw the attention away from themselves. The “Res State” part of the Republican Party still has not gotten over the fact that a colored man is our president. A man who, in my opinion, is the best choice we could have made.
it really is hilarious that the chosen party of white southern racists is screaming so loudly about an accomplished latina judge being a racist. talk about not throwing stones in glass houses! it's almost like britney spears running around accusing other people of being stupid
And they don’t have a clue about how ridicules they look.