About time.

First, America’s largest Christian denomination on the subject of torture:

The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of The Southern Baptist Convention

SBC’s Richard Land condemns ‘waterboarding’ and torture

NASHVILLE, Tenn., May 6, 2009 –There is no room for torture as part of the United States’ intelligence-gathering process, Richard Land said today. He also said he believes the practice known as “waterboarding” is torture and, as such, is unethical.

Land, president of the SBC’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, said there is no circumstance in which torture should be permissible in interrogations by U.S. officials, even if the authorities believe a prisoner has information that might involve national security.

“I don’t agree with the belief that we should use any means necessary to extract information,” said Land. “I believe there are absolutes. There are things we must never do under any circumstances.

“For me the ultimate test is: Could I, in good conscience, do whatever I am authorizing or condoning others to do? If not, then I must oppose the action. If I could not waterboard someone–and I couldn’t–then I must oppose its practice.”

Now a group of American Muslims speaks out:
We, the Muslim-American community, condemn torture. It is irreligious, immoral, and unethical.

Our religious history is replete with stories demanding that we condemn abuse and torture. The Prophet Moses (AS) sacrificed his royal position to stop an act of torture. The Prophet Jesus (AS) was tortured in an exercise of the brutality of power. The Prophet Muhammad (SAS) forbade the mistreatment of prisoners. Husayn (AS), the Prophet’s grandson, was denied food and water, an act of torture, the abhorrence of which is now part of Muslim cultural memory.

We are are compelled to speak out against torture—just as we condemn acts of terrorism because of their immoral nature. We challenge our co-religionists to live to a higher standard and we challenge our fellow Americans to live to a higher standard.

The torture of human beings at the behest of the American government must be condemned. Extraordinary rendition must be stopped. Simply because another country allows torture does not mean we should encourage and utilize the moral weakness of others. When we ratified the Convention Against Torture President Ronald Reagan said, “[We] clearly express United States opposition to torture, an abhorrent practice unfortunately still prevalent in the world today.” The violence of torture is the result of power without a moral compass; it is not a model that we as Americans and Muslims believe is one that should be emulated.

Granted, me and the religionists don’t tend to get along all that often. It’s still nice though to see them trying to practice what they preach. Where be the Catholic Church, I wonder…

h/t Daily Dish

  1. Schu says:

    No follower of any religious organization can condone the use of torture. Only militant factions pushing their own warped version of events for their own ends use torture. As to a Catholic response, I can only point to the council of Bishops repeated pleas concerning the events in Latin America for their position. I am not Catholic, but I have run across their statements on the abuses in this area. Most people, who use torture, do so for political ends. The torture of westerners in the Middle East, South East Asia, and Latin America, and US tortures of terrorists suspects are for political ends, not religious.

    • Metavirus says:

      on the catholic question, think about how apoplectic and vocal many leading catholics and their bishops have been over obama speaking at notre dame, simply because obama is pro-choice. now compare that against their (and the Vatican's) studied silence over the horrors that bush visited on prisoners in us custody. very sad.

      to your point about the torture of westerners — unless we investigate and hold the torture-authorizers in the bush administration accountable, we will have zero moral authority to speak out in the future on abuses against our troops committed in the future by foreign governments.

  2. degringolade says:

    Where are the Catholics? They've gotta be somewhere near Laura Ingraham's colon by now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Authors