(0 comments)The International Committee for the Red Cross (the organization empowered by international law to investigate claims of prisoner abuse) released the second part of its report on the treatment of detainees by the United States.
As before, the results are damning, and this time directly implicate medical officers who participated in the torture:
Medical officers who oversaw interrogations of terrorism suspects in CIA secret prisons committed gross violations of medical ethics and in some cases essentially participated in torture, the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded in a confidential report that labeled the CIA program “inhuman.”
Health personnel offered supervision and even assistance as suspected al-Qaeda operatives were beaten, deprived of food, exposed to temperature extremes and subjected to waterboarding, the relief agency said in the 2007 report, a copy of which was posted on a magazine Web site yesterday. The report quoted one medical official as telling a detainee: “I look after your body only because we need you for information.”
Read the WaPo article on the report or view the whole report here (note: it’s a PDF).
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Fast Food
Official Gingrich-Cain 2012 response to Rick Santorum’s homophobia: “Rick, Rick, Rick. Don’t you know that the anti-gay bigotry only carries water if you have a few failed straight marriages under your belt?” Follow all their other words of wisdom here. (0 comments)Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape
Here’s Grandpa Fustypants on rape and abortion:“If it’s an honest rape, that individual should go immediately to the emergency room, I would give them a shot of estrogen.”
via (4 comments)Unhinged vagina-shackler on Komen’s volte face:Cancer is Cancer! Aboration is Aboration!
(0 comments)Since it’s Mitt Romney week everywhere, I figured I’d post this op-ed by an ex-Mormon, which is a pretty interesting take at the institutional culture of the LDS church. Not much to say about it, but it’s definitely worth 5 or so minutes of your time. (0 comments)Why Bipartisanship Is Impossible, In One Sentence
When one party climbs back to power by promising action on the economy, does nothing on it, and instead spends literally all its time trying to hurt the other party. (0 comments)New From The Gingrich-Cain Front
Newt rants about cable movies he doesn’t like, and flips out when Herman tries to seize control. Catch all the fun here. And the main site is here, as always. (0 comments)Headline of the Week: Making Rapeanade
Leave it to TBogg:
(0 comments)Rick Santorum Suggests That When Life Gives You Rape, You Should Make Rapeanade Back when I was in junior high and the Clinton Impeachment was going on, I could hardly have imagined that Clinton would be used as an excuse for wrongdoing by Republican leaders. But that’s where we are. Interesting, isn’t it? (0 comments)Catch up with the official Gingrich-Cain “Great Statesmen” series over at @GingrichCain12. (0 comments)Only 65% of White Americans Have a Favorable Opinion of MLK Jr
…with a whimper. Drum is worth reading on this. I think he’s just got to be the most overhyped and overcovered guy who never managed better than third place since…Joe Lieberman? (0 comments)Mitt Romney's Overwhelming Inauthenticity
It’s amazing to me that Mitt Romney brings up France as a scary comparison point to himself so often when he spent years there and speaks the language. It’s such a minor point, but telling. Of all the people running for president, Mitt Romney has to be the most aware that the rightwing caricature of ... (0 comments)Mother Teresa Doesn't Deserve Sainthood
Case in point. It’s amazing how all the famous/respected Catholic figures from the 1990s have turned out to be incredibly corrupt, isn’t it? I’m sure they’re somehow connected. Of course, as I’m a Protestant I know little about such things. (1 comments)I Fixed It! Ban Sitting Politicians From Running For Another Office
Wonkette reminded me of one of the provisions that I want to write into my fantasy Constitution:No person who holds any elected office shall be permitted to seek election to any other office until he shall have permanently vacated his current post.
(2 comments)The Kardashians want their own magazine?
Unintentionally hilarious: “Bachmann, 55, told a small group of supporters Tuesday night that she was staying in the presidential race…”What other kind of group of Bachmann supporters could there be?(0 comments)Blogroll
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Steve Benen @ Washington Monthly
- Ta-Nehisi
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- WTF Is It Now?!?
DOWN THE VINE
Popular Posts
- Overplaying Your Hand, Or Why John Boehner Is A Really Sucky House Speaker 0 comment(s)
- Mitch Daniels: The Latest Failure To Build A New McCain 4 comment(s)
- Ron Paul Quote of the Week: Honest Rape 4 comment(s)
- Most Awesome Company Slogan Ever 1 comment(s)
- Fox News Has a First Amendment Right to Lie – Updated 50 comment(s)
Grape Explorer
- Vatican Insists Antisemite Bishop Must Say Sorry
- Blog Love
- Mountains Out Of Molehills
- Better News
- Lose-Lose On The Debt Ceiling
- Quote of the Day: "World Leader" to Obama
- Sunday Ruminations on the Palin Fiasco
- Health Insurance Denials May Lead to Permanent Deafness in Young Girl
- Blood libel leads to bleeding
- Americans Rejecting Stridency of Religious Right
Tags
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorArchives
- February 2012 (27)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (62)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)
Syndication




B-b-b-ut… "[..] the report finds that they did nothing wrong. Well, actually the Red Cross report calls their actions a "gross breach of medical ethics." But if you read the given examples, that conclusion appears pretty illogical, and based on nothing more than general opposition to torture." —Unreligious Right
You see? Nothing of substance here, the Red Cross is just being illogical with its "general opposition to torture". That Hippocratic Oath is soooo 4th century BC.
wow. you must have a stomach of steel to be able to so routinely wade into the depths of that guy's fantasies, delusions and denial.
the situation is actually quite simple when you break it down. imagine iran capturing some of our soldiers and doing to them what we did to our War on Terror prisoners. now imagine the unrestrained apoplexy that would be unleashed at the National Review (and the Unreligious Right) when they found out about it and discovered that the highest level of iran's government approved of waterboarding our brave soldiers, or depriving them of sleep to the point where they were literally driven insane.
Don't you get it? We're the good guys who don't invade other countries without just cause (srsly!), so we have the right to torture anyone we think is secretly planning to attack us. But if Iran were to capture and torture some of our soldiers then that would be evil, because all our soldiers are perfectly good while Iranians are the bad guys. It's all so simple.
oh yeah, i forgot. standards for the darkie moooslems are different than the standards we should apply to ourselves.
sigh… it's really sad how the force of someone's ideology can so completely erase any ability to engage in rational thought
"the situation is actually quite simple when you break it down. imagine iran capturing some of our soldiers and doing to them what we did to our War on Terror prisoners. now imagine the unrestrained apoplexy that would be unleashed at the National Review (and the Unreligious Right)."
The U.S. hasn't tortured any soldiers, so you might want to try a better analogy. Iran would be well within its rights to torture any CIA operatives it captures, in order to protect its country. Torture is an occupational hazard for spies, saboteurs and terrorists. I can't speak for National Review, but there would be no apoplexy from me.
"Don't you get it? We're the good guys who don't invade other countries without just cause (srsly!), so we have the right to torture anyone we think is secretly planning to attack us"
That's certainly not an argument I'd ever make. But nice strawman.
""sigh… it's really sad how the force of someone's ideology can so completely erase any ability to engage in rational thought"
There's an ironic comment, coming from someone who has nothing but slurs for a someone with a differing opinion.
thanks for playing. the US tortured prisoners in its custody. don't take it from me, take it from the top Bush military justice official at Guantanamo:
"The top Bush administration official in charge of deciding whether to bring Guantanamo Bay detainees to trial has concluded that the U.S. military tortured a Saudi national who allegedly planned to participate in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti…
You are welcome to your own opinions but you are not entitled to your own facts.
If you continue to deny that the US tortured people, you have let your ideology blind you to the truth, which is sad.
I just emailed the following toLTG Eric B. Schoomaker, Surgeon General, US Army. I encourage others to do something similar.
Sir,
As a 20 year MSC and son of a 30 year AF officer I was saddened to read that the IRC stated that military medics had assisted in torture of detainees.
This is not acceptable and the, "Commander told me to do it" excuse is also not acceptable.
You must find and discipline every medic involved -- especially leadership.
Thank you, Gerald H Fisher Maj, USARMY, Ret.
Right on. I will do the same. It is especially shameful that doctors and medical professionals assisted in the torture and violated their Hippocratic oath in the process. Very sad.