With all the blogging I’ve been doing over the last few months, I’ve started to wonder whether there’s a point at which being too well-informed becomes debilitating. I went a good number of years during the Bush administration being completely tuned out from a lot of what was going on in the world. In a way, I think a good part of it was an act of self-preservation.

During the 2008 election, Obama’s candidacy ripped me out of my complacency and got me engaged again. Now that he’s in office, and the lack of complacency persists, I continue to read news outlets and blogs voraciously and post some of the best (worst?) bits here.

This brings me to my point. A lot of the stuff I come across on a daily basis is horrifying. On a daily basis, I absorb reams of religious extremism (both foreign and American), stupidity, ignorance, intolerance, subtle/not-so-subtle gay-bashing, and more examples of gob-smackingly stupid Republican lunacy (seriously, click the link and try not to involuntarily smack your head on the table) than I ever thought imaginable. Although I think blogging about some of this can be pretty cathartic, at what point does the deluge threaten to drown me?

I often envy people who have a spouse, religion, kids, hobbies and other things that fill up their life to the point where they no longer have any time or inclination to independently inform themselves beyond the occasional talking point fed to them by their friends, preachers, Fox News or other convenient sources of soothing empty-calorie mind nourishment.

Is there a happy medium that can be struck? Am I making too much out of this? Was Mill actually right in saying “it is better to be Socrates unsatisfied than a fool satisfied”? At what point does all the cruelty, dishonesty, ignorance and evil in the world become too much to handle?

Metavirus filed this under:  
  1. Gherald L says:

    I began to blog a couple weeks into Palin's candidacy because it was driving my favorite blogger insane and I needed a place to collect my own thoughts.

    Now I feel like staying hyper-informed. I suppose the impetus will last until a sense of normalcy returns, which I suspect will be after the 2010 midterms.

    Then I'll try for a happier medium. I've adopted Socrates' saying that the unexamined life is not worth living…I may eventually slow the pace, but I'll not stop that heretical examination.

    I've definitely slowed down on politics since the election though. My "Must read" tag currently has 3000+ unread posts, whereas it seldom got over 100 back then and that was with Ezra Klein, ThinkProgress, TAPPED, the Corner, all of TPM and all of Culture 11 were still in it, which was pretty nuts. I've since demoted all those, but of course I've added some new things like economics

  2. LeeAnn says:

    I think you have to remember that those of us who are not overly involved are perhaps approaching things from another perspective…I am not avoiding (I read your blog and NEED to read your blog) and I try, in my private, quiet little life, to influence my co-workers, my children, my friends and family. I embrace others with love so that the bashers have an example of that -- I try, quietly to be that example b/c for now (it might be different someday and has been different in the past) I'm don't havef the fortitude to be more outspoken and "out there." But it isn't complacency at all and I need those "out there" like you to keep my quiet little life focused and on track. I thank you for your signposts to me throughout the day but I also hope that when your health, or personal life require it, that you can take a little step back and maybe then it'll be my turn to be "out there" and sign waving while you have a little break.

    • Metavirus says:

      thanks leeann — I hope you and other people don't take my statements above to mean I was somehow dissing the more contemplative life; far from it! reading over what i wrote again, i can see how it might have come off a bit holier-than-thou. i'm not sure how to re-phrase it at the moment, but i do value a distinction in my mind between folks who aren't necessarily all that "involved" (whatever that means) but yet make an effort to think for themselves and not just get spoon-fed Establishment-Approved Talking Points (TM) and, well, the opposite.

      it's funny but i haven't really thought of myself as overly "outspoken" lately — mainly because I blog under a pseudonym and, in my real life, i generally keep to myself and don't find many occasions to be outspoken in person. thinking about what you wrote, i realize that i should be thinking about things a little differently. this whole "too much information!" agita is still just kinda rolling around in my head right now. i'll have lots more to write in the coming days!

      thanks for reading!

  3. Chris Blask says:

    I think there is a pattern of attention that makes it bearable -- iow you have to let yourself wander off and plant azaleas sometimes as well. I don't think you are going to find that you can ever let it all go -- it is a burden that is not optional -- but you can moderate it.

    • Metavirus says:

      great advice. i am definitely coming to see it as a "burden that is not optional". now to figure out how to moderate it! :) thanks for taking the time to offer your suggestion

  4. Pig #2 says:

    Wiser has always meant sadder. The First Little Pig has not yet heard of the wolf. Only the wolf is of unflagging good cheer, because pigs one and two are in endless supply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

Authors