... (0 comments)Reader Gherald L. wrote a sharp response on his blog to a post I wrote on Blue Dog Democrats and why I think Harry Reid is a tool. There’s a great conversation going on in the comments on my earlier post. Check it out.
Update: Harry Reid signals that he is ready, willing and able to grab his ankles for the Republican/Blue Dog opposition:
Senate Majority Leader Reid said today he would drop a cram-down provision from a House-passed banking bill if the language threatened to keep the Senate from passing the overall bill. The provision would allow a bankruptcy judge to reduce a homeowner’s mortgage principal. “If we can’t get the votes for that, and I am hopeful we can — I am semiconfident we can — then what I’ll do is take that off [the bill] and do the other banking provisions,” Reid said at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast. Reid said he would work to keep the package intact, but raising the prospect of pulling the provision seemed to acknowledge assertions by Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., and others that the cram-down bill cannot pass due to opposition from Republicans and some Democratic moderates.Digby notes:
Apparently, the “compromise” is to only apply cramdown to subprime mortgages, which sounds terrific, right? Except, as Kagro points out here, most of the subprime mortgages have already defaulted. So that’s all over. The big money boyz don’t want regular qualified borrowers who are caught up in the recessionary blowback of unemployment and soaring uncovered health care costs to be able to renegotiate mortgages through bankruptcy. Moral hazard, dontcha know. Because, gawd knows, these lending institutions are all about morality.Now, I don’t think it’s wrong to compromise. Nor do I hereby anoint the cramdown provision with perfection and holiness. No, I don’t think that Obama walks on water, and no, I don’t think that every proposal to issue forth from his saintly lips is heavenly gospel. What I do find concerning, however, is that the Conservadems are already, after only two months into a new administration, threatening to sink major parts of Obama’s legislation at the behest of the Republicans. This is exactly what they did to the Clinton health care plan in 1993 and how the abomination of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was created.
Update 2: More evidence supporting my conclusion that Harry Reid is a tool:
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Friday that John Roberts misled the Senate during his confirmation hearings by pretending to be a moderate – and that the United States is now “stuck” with him as chief justice.Seriously? Little, delicate Harry Reid was waylaid and bamboozled on the plantation by the fast-talkin’ Salesman Roberts from the Big City who, with his fancy words, did force — force, I say! — Mr. Reid to part with his cherished, and often-clutched, pearls? I declare!
As publius notes:
Ah yes, no one could have predicted…. Please. The Senate isn’t the most discerning bunch of people in the world, but it was pretty clear to all that Roberts was strongly conservative.
Anyway, what really bothers me about Reid’s comments is that they reinforce the idea that confirmation hearings matters. They don’t — and we’d all probably be better off ignoring them entirely.
Reid is suggesting that Senators based their vote on what Roberts said during the confirmation hearings. Again, I’m just hoping that’s BS, because the alternative (that Senators actually voted based on his confirmation promises) is pretty depressing.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Fast Food
Unhinged vagina-shackler on Komen’s volte face:Cancer is Cancer! Aboration is Aboration!
(0 comments)Since it’s Mitt Romney week everywhere, I figured I’d post this op-ed by an ex-Mormon, which is a pretty interesting take at the institutional culture of the LDS church. Not much to say about it, but it’s definitely worth 5 or so minutes of your time. (0 comments)Why Bipartisanship Is Impossible, In One Sentence
When one party climbs back to power by promising action on the economy, does nothing on it, and instead spends literally all its time trying to hurt the other party. (0 comments)New From The Gingrich-Cain Front
Newt rants about cable movies he doesn’t like, and flips out when Herman tries to seize control. Catch all the fun here. And the main site is here, as always. (0 comments)Headline of the Week: Making Rapeanade
Leave it to TBogg:
(0 comments)Rick Santorum Suggests That When Life Gives You Rape, You Should Make Rapeanade Back when I was in junior high and the Clinton Impeachment was going on, I could hardly have imagined that Clinton would be used as an excuse for wrongdoing by Republican leaders. But that’s where we are. Interesting, isn’t it? (0 comments)Catch up with the official Gingrich-Cain “Great Statesmen” series over at @GingrichCain12. (0 comments)Only 65% of White Americans Have a Favorable Opinion of MLK Jr
…with a whimper. Drum is worth reading on this. I think he’s just got to be the most overhyped and overcovered guy who never managed better than third place since…Joe Lieberman? (0 comments)Mitt Romney's Overwhelming Inauthenticity
It’s amazing to me that Mitt Romney brings up France as a scary comparison point to himself so often when he spent years there and speaks the language. It’s such a minor point, but telling. Of all the people running for president, Mitt Romney has to be the most aware that the rightwing caricature of ... (0 comments)Mother Teresa Doesn't Deserve Sainthood
Case in point. It’s amazing how all the famous/respected Catholic figures from the 1990s have turned out to be incredibly corrupt, isn’t it? I’m sure they’re somehow connected. Of course, as I’m a Protestant I know little about such things. (1 comments)I Fixed It! Ban Sitting Politicians From Running For Another Office
Wonkette reminded me of one of the provisions that I want to write into my fantasy Constitution:No person who holds any elected office shall be permitted to seek election to any other office until he shall have permanently vacated his current post.
(2 comments)The Kardashians want their own magazine?
Unintentionally hilarious: “Bachmann, 55, told a small group of supporters Tuesday night that she was staying in the presidential race…”What other kind of group of Bachmann supporters could there be?(0 comments)Santorum Finishes #2, Sliding Down In The Final Minutes To Lose To Romney
I was really hoping that Santorum would win the Iowa caucuses. The disgustingly puerile humor would have lasted for WEEKS! (0 comments)Good stuff: The National Labor Relations Board announced on Wednesday that it had adopted new rules that would speed up unionization elections, its last major policy decision before it drops to two members and can no longer make new decisions. It approved the rules in a 2-to-1 vote. The labor board said the new rules, which have ... (0 comments)A Dinosaur Infringed On A Patent For Rocks...
Reading this lead-in to an article today made me think of cavemen and dinosaurs:“The long-running antitrust suit Novell filed regarding Microsoft’s alleged tactics to prevent WordPerfect from running properly in Windows 95 seemed to be on the verge of conclusion…”
... (0 comments)Blogroll
- Andrew Sullivan
- Ars Technica
- Balloon Juice
- Crooks and Liars
- Daniel Larison
- Emily L. Hauser
- Ezra Klein
- FrumForum
- Glenn Greenwald
- Jonathan Chait
- Kevin Drum
- League of Ordinary Gentlemen
- Little Green Footballs
- Matthew Yglesias
- Radley Balko
- Right Wing Watch
- Steve Benen @ Washington Monthly
- Ta-Nehisi
- The A.V. Club
- TPM Muckraker
- Unreasonable Faith
- Washington Independent
- WTF Is It Now?!?
DOWN THE VINE
Popular Posts
- Mitch Daniels: The Latest Failure To Build A New McCain 4 comment(s)
- How DARE YOU Politicize Our Decision To Politicize Breast Cancer! 2 comment(s)
- Fox News Has a First Amendment Right to Lie – Updated 50 comment(s)
- Why Mormonism Is Not Christianity, Briefly 6 comment(s)
- Just Like Suicide 0 comment(s)
Grape Explorer
- BBC Reports on Iran Elections While American Media Remains Virtually Silent
- Quote of the Day: Klein on Rove, Cheney, et al
- World Net Daily Calls For Imposition of God's Law, Theocracy in U.S.
- Nerd Update: RIFT, A Hot New MMO, Coming Out Soon
- Why Does Andrew Sullivan Remain A Catholic?
- Not Going To Fade Away In Wisconsin
- Marriage Equality - Hate Alone Cannot Forever Sustain the Beast
- Most Awesomely Offensive Brüno Interviews
- Red State: Jesus Would Have Approved Waterboarding
- Quote of the Day: Ted Kennedy in 1980
Tags
2010 Election 2012 Election Abortion Barack Obama Bullshit Bush Christianity Congress Conservatives Deep Thoughts Democrats Economy Fail Foreign Policy Fox News Gay Marriage Hatred Health Care Ignorance Insanity Iran Law LGBT Issues Libertarianism Lies Media Mitt Romney Music Policy Polls Quotes Racism Rebuttals Recession Republicans Right Wing Sarah Palin Scandal Stupidity Teabaggers Torture Truth Video War Crimes War on TerrorArchives
- February 2012 (11)
- January 2012 (67)
- December 2011 (57)
- November 2011 (72)
- October 2011 (62)
- September 2011 (55)
- August 2011 (53)
- July 2011 (44)
- June 2011 (71)
- May 2011 (91)
- April 2011 (101)
- March 2011 (104)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (71)
- December 2010 (73)
- November 2010 (59)
- October 2010 (80)
- September 2010 (64)
- August 2010 (39)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (27)
- May 2010 (54)
- April 2010 (34)
- March 2010 (38)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (62)
- December 2009 (57)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (76)
- September 2009 (50)
- August 2009 (85)
- July 2009 (56)
- June 2009 (141)
- May 2009 (103)
- April 2009 (113)
- March 2009 (66)
- February 2009 (43)
- January 2009 (87)
- December 2008 (18)
(


I'm not sure why you think it's "at the behest of Republicans" — might some moderate Dems actually agree with Republicans on some issues or represent constituencies (raises own hand) who do?
Don't Ask Don't Tell is clearly bad policy, but it was at least better than the status quo of the time (gays couldn't serve). But yeah you can blame the more socially conservative Dems for this. I trust their horizons have expanded a bit since the early 90's.
Ditching the poorly-conceived and executed Clinton health plan was a good decision from where I'm sitting. I'm not a fan of Obama's plan either but he's going about it in a better way and at least has a mandate to do it. Clinton didn't.
There's little anyone could have done to prevent Robert's confirmation since he was so obviously brilliant. My takeaway from Reid's recent comments on Roberts is that he's trying to frame the process for Obama's appointments to be seen as less ideologically driven.
For info on why cramdowns are a bad idea I'll direct you to Megan McArdle:
Why isn't it a good thing for bankruptcy judges to write down mortgage debt?
What's the matter with mortgage cramdowns?
Mortgage cramdowns are a bad option
More on mortgage cramdowns
More questions about the mortgage cramdown
fair points all around. "at the behest of the Republicans" was probably inapt. i probably meant "at the behest of the corporate special interests lobbying to maintain the status quo ante". i honestly don't believe that there are that many politicians in washington who really want change. lobbying culture has grown to the point where most politicians are more worried with protecting their backside than fighting for ordinary americans.
as to don't ask, don't tell, many studies show that gays serving in the military were targeted more frequently as a result of the policy. real people, with real lives and real families suffered as a result of incremantalist accomodationalism.
as for health care, we absolutely needed then, and we absolutely need now, a national health care system that covers every american. again, these are real people, with real lives, and real families who are being maimed and killed in this country every year as a result of undercoverage and lack of coverage. it is an absolute travesty that we are the only western democracy without national healthcare coverage. and it is just as shameful that we are the only developed country in which tens of thousands of people every year declare bankruptcy and lose their homes because of medical costs. i don't care how it gets done but it needs to get done. again, it was the accomodationalist moderates in the democratic party who killed health care reform, at the behest of the entrenched interests who lobbied rapaciously for the plan's failure.
at this point, the country needs radical change in a number of important areas. doing nothing is not an option. doing just a little bit here and a little bit there is not an option. the last 8 years of wide-ranging neglect under the bush administration and his republican and democrat enablers can no longer stand. we are in too deep, and our situation is far too dire, to let the campaign-contribution-laden voices of the status quo in congress succeed again in cravenly shutting down any attempts to fix the system that is so drastically broken.